ddplf

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You made me look ridiculously stupid and rightfully so. Actually, I take that back, I made myself look stupid and you made it obvious as it gets! Thanks for the wake up call

If I understand correctly, the model is in a way a dictionary of questions with responses, where the journey of figuring out the response is skipped. As in, the answer for the question "What's the point of existence" is "42", but it doesn't contain the thinking process that lead to this result.

If that's so, then wouldn't it be especially prone to hallucinations? I don't imagine it would respond adequately to the third "why?" in the row.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago (8 children)

And how does that help with the privacy?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love asking him "Was 1989 a good year for China?" with DeepThink enabled.

You can see him thinking for a second before he goes "[...] Hmm, I need to keep in mind that..." and then you just see him crash abruptly

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (32 children)

What am I looking at? What's the reason behind this collapse?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Depends who you ask, just make sure you don't start off with them furries

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I don't. Show me where it has it's balls so I can crush them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just use the paint, internet person

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

$2000 per month is just fucking ridiculous if you're not mortgaging it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Oh nice, someone created a JavaScript-heavy website based on >100MB minimals.cc boilerplate to compose something that could well be made of a single HTML document.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What league are you on OnlyFans?

 

You'd think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it's key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I'd never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

view more: next ›