drkt

Catbox has always been a problem for me. Sometimes it'll work for a day or two and then not work for another month. I emailed them and they said they're not doing any blocking on their side.

whatever.

Der er ting der virker så åbenlyst i min verden at jeg ikke forstår hvorfor det overhovedet er nyheder. Ligesom at vi ikke installere Flappy Bird på vores arbejdstelefoner, så skal offentligt ansatte selvfølgelig heller ikke?

Kommunerne skal have mulighed for fri organisering.

Det bliver så nederen at være handikappet i Horsens Kommune...

For one I don't use software that updates constantly. If I had to log in to a container more than once a year to fix something, I'd figure out something else. My NAS is just harddrives on a Debian machine.

Everything I use runs either Debian or is some form of BSD

If I host it inside the Tor network, or I2P, then I've practically cut out all points centralization out except my ISP. I live in a country where Tor isn't illegal, though, and they can't know what I'm doing inside Tor by design so they'd have to find another excuse. Anyway I don't own any American domains.

As a side point: I would ironically be far worse off if I owned a domain from my own countrys TLD because they are incredibly strict about them.

Neither of those 3 points have anything to do with what I said. This isn't a conversation about you having to tolerate me, it's a conversation about what state actors can do to censor Lemmy. Which is very little, because I can host an instance out of my bedroom and do basically whatever I want.

buy an ad

How am I, a non-Am*rican citizen, going to lose something that I host out of my bedroom because Am*ricans got upset over what I said?

Thanks I'll never visit Hamburg

That's based of Hamburg as far as explicit costs go, but there's also implicit costs. I don't know Hamburg, I've never been there, but I'll make an assumption that it's like every other big city with urban parking and ICE cars stuck in traffic every morning, bellowing fumes out for everyone to breathe.

It is my argument that for every dollar you don't explicitly spend on car infrastructure, you'll get it back tenfold in implicit costs being alleviated elsewhere, especially in the physical- and mental healthcare sectors.

It sounds like all of the problems they've faced are matters of fiscal priority. By contrast, how much money was spent on car infrastructure that ultimately has still not fixed traffic? I'm betting that number is higher.