dx1

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago

The origins of metal have more moral correctness than the "Christian" US. Scroll all the way back to 1970, "War Pigs" by Black Sabbath. Song very plainly and literally about the corruption of the political establishment and the evil of war. That undercurrent never went away, all the way to the present.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

In the past week I caught a 7 day ban for "misinformation" (x3, then for reposting a link to the mod logs, "skirting the rules", "repeated offenses" etc.) from /c/WorldNews for accusing Democrats of being complicit in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. An actual fact - tens of billions of dollars in arms sent to an ongoing genocide/ethnic cleansing by Biden. No problems like that on lemmy.ml. That really says it all for me. Lemmy's basically just a fediverse reddit, with the same mod structure - if mods abuse their power, and admins don't keep them in check, it's time to ditch the instance.

By the way, Lemmy itself was created by Dessalines, the admin of lemmy.ml. Who I collaborated with briefly on building some of the UI that you're using right now to read this. Very thorough guy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oops, replied to wrong comment.

Yes, we had this kind of logic before. https://allthatsinteresting.com/voting-literacy-test Turns out that "regulations" that restrict key democratic functions of societies are actually weaponized by tyrannical states against marginalized people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the ten thousandth time in this thread, it's circular logic for a population not to vote for someone because they think no one will vote for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If everyone who had voted for Harris had voted for De la Cruz instead she still wouldn’t have won.

And?

There are no serious third party options in the US currently.

As assessed by you, based on arbitrary criteria and questionable analysis.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can't magically change everyone's behavior. I'm not a deity. All I can do is describe what behaviors are required of a population in a representative democracy, for the system to not turn on them, or to reverse the grip of a system that has already turned on them. Each one teach one.

Game theory of course applies. But the game has hundreds of millions of participants (ignoring the broader global population, which also influences it). The error in analyzing election choices is to only myopically look at the "what do we do if it's a 49.999% 49.999% split" and ignore the behavior of the entire GROUP. The fact that every member of the population has the power to make arbitrary choices in the election, and entirely determines the result of the election, including the supposedly predetermined 49.999%x2 split we keep ending back at, prior to the election actually taking place. We create this reality by assuming its inevitability - no more, no less. There's literally infinite pathways for social organization among the general population, but in ignoring them, we completely sacrifice our own power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, I have heard this math. Many, many, many, many times. Now, try the math where this is a democracy, we have the right to vote for whoever we want, the election results aren't magically predetermined, and the 100% can be subdivided in any way among the group of all candidates - so long as the population, or even just a majority of it, isn't religiously locked into the idea that they must vote for whatever candidate has a specific label or color next to their name.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And, lo and behold, he did not respond with specific responses to the actual claims I made. On reddit, this is when I would hit the "block" button, because I know they're just wasting my time. But here they just keep responding forever until I stop responding myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your statement is a logical contradiction. The Iron Dome does not activate when the projected path of the rocket does not appear to target civilians

It does, actually, it performs a triage when it can't handle a large number of simultaneous projectiles, and of COURSE it's designed to intercept missiles sent to military targets. What a bizarre claim. You are flat out making things up to support your argument, for god knows what reason.

Y’all were doing so well being sympathetic

I'm not Palestinian. I'm an impartial observer of what's happening, just one who cares more than most of you, enough to sort through disinformation...

subject of your vote for Trump

Just flat out lying now. I'm done here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How is it that I had heard of them months before the election, and you're still catching up?

Back to the point I made elsewhere - the population is abdicating their responsibility to vote responsibly, that is the core problem here. Election came and went, and you didn't even research the non-D/R candidates. As the saying goes, politics isn't a spectator sport. Your approach is basically like going to a car dealership and asking them nicely to give the best deal. You gave up all your power at the door. You didn't fight them on the random fees they threw into the price, you just went, well, at least it's not the RAM dealership across the street. You didn't look on Craigslist for used cars listed by sellers, you didn't ask a mechanic what brand to get, nothing.

view more: next ›