egerlach

It depends if you view the X-Y plane as the camera/viewport/screen or the ground. If X-Y is the ground, then Z is either up or down.

That makes more sense. Simple explanation of my error. Thank you.

Okay, am I understanding this correctly? In Y-up right-hand, positive X is "to the left"?

I personally think that right-hand Z-up makes the most sense, but it makes sense to move to where most of the industry is going.

I can't wait for next week's BTS...

No, Bastard (Operators from Hell).

Hopefully that checks out, even though it's an old reference.

(Also, agree with the original expression of the negative systemic evaluation of the US policing system, even if I don't love the crude expression; and even though I'm contributing in a humourous satire of the expression)

This is the only response needed to any overtures from the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAbATWsvjTE

And sorry Democrats, until you get your Republican problem under control, we can't trust you either. In 2016 it looked like it might just be a flare-up, but the reappearance of symptoms indicates that the infection is deeper and ongoing.

Oh thank goodness. Coffee Stain is by far my current favourite publisher, and I was worried with them getting caught up in all this Embracer stuff.

This is one of my new favourite episodes of Game Changer. I could be convinced it's a new high for the show.

Season 7 is so good. I'm afraid that they decide to go out on a high and not do a season 8 😨

Possible interpretation assuming positive intent: "Lol" in this case could mean "Oh shit, I didn't realize that, damn the internet sucks at attribution. It's funny that even I can get caught in it sometimes."

"Lol" doesn't have to be douchey if you don't want it to be.

(I acknowledge that I don't know @[email protected] and they could be a douche, but I choose to assume they're not until proven otherwise)

"Hurt people hurt people"? (potential explanaiton, not justification)

I can't remember who it was, but sometime in the last few years a VC or CEO wrote an article documenting their day and how they "worked 12 hours a day" or something like that. What I remember most is that their accounting of their work included their time at the gym, at least one meal, and something else that few if any employers would consider "working time".

I agree that sometimes C-suite execs do work long hours sometimes, and I'll differ from you in that sometimes those long hours are legitimate and valuable for a company. IMO, it's not the norm nor is it generally worth the premium that most companies pay for those hours.

I don't disagree, I was just trying to quote what I heard as exactly as I remembered it.

I would argue that there is a version of conservatism that is an ideology, but it hasn't been the predominant form in the US for quite some time.