hallettj

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I raised my kids using metric temperature for weather. Now that they're older they hold me to it!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

1 cm is about the width of the tip of your pinky finger.

1 m is about the distance from your nose to your fingertips if you hold your arm out, and extend your fingers.

100 m is the length of the straight section of an athletic track, which is about the same length as a football field.

1 mL is about the volume of the tip of your pinky finger.

1 L is about 1 quart, which is half a carton of milk (unless you get milk in the smaller 1 quart size).

The mile-to-km conversion is pretty close to 1½.

The kg-to-pound conversion is two-and-a-bit.

A difference of 1°C is close to a difference of 2°F.

Edit: My milk comparison was wrong - I've corrected it.

Edit: Of course by "m" I meant "mile"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This advice is also golden!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Neat! I'd heard of mutualistic mycorrhizal relationships, but not mycoheterotrophy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure if I've used more in the last 25 years. And when I did I think it was in MS-DOS.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

For the sake of benefit of the doubt, it's possible to simultaneously understand the thesis of the article, and to hold the opinion that AI doesn't lead to higher-quality products. That would likely involve agreeing with the premise that laying off workers is a bad idea, but disagreeing (at least partially) with the reasoning why it's a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the article seems to assume AI is the cause without attempting to rule out other factors. Plus the graph shows a steady decline starting years before ChatGPT appeared.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Here's a thread with basically the same question that has references to some specific laws: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/1cbyw91/can_my_employer_mandate_where_i_shop_as_a/

That thread is in reference to Ohio. Replies call out Ohio labor provisions, and laws regarding rebate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Here's someone on Bluesky who does regular "three wins today" posts. But those are mixed with less positive news. https://bsky.app/profile/ariellaelm.bsky.social

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer either. But going off the company store insight, maybe we can look to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It prohibits paying wages in scrip, or "similar devices". Scrip can take a couple of forms; one is an internal company currency that can only be spent at the company store. That provision in the FLSA was specifically intended to shut down company store scams.

It seems that an implied condition of your work is spending some portion of your wages at certain stores. Since scrip is money that can only be spent in certain places, it might be argued that if you are required to spend a portion of your wages in certain places, that has the same effect as paying a portion of your wages in scrip.

Unfortunately after a bit of searching I haven't seen this specific argument made. But again, I'm not a lawyer, and I don't know how to research case law. It sounds like they're trying to claim this program in optional, so it might be challenging to prove that participation is de facto mandatory. ~~I'm guessing if you could get someone to tell you a number for how much they expect you to spend in this program that would help with such an argument.~~ On second thought, I don't actually know how helpful a number would be, and I don't want to get you in trouble.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (11 children)

The article doesn't suggest using Control+C. It talks about dedicated copy and paste key codes, and you can program your keyboard to map those codes to whatever keys you like. They suggest Fn+C.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a good point! The string is in there, and I can see it with strings. But in my research so far it's looking like making a simple string substitution might not be an option. The replacement string would be a Nix store path which would be longer. That would shift over subsequent bytes in the binary which it sounds like would produce alignment issues that would break things.

Apparently it's ok to change the length of the ELF header, which is what patchelf does. But shifting bytes in the ELF body is a problem.

Now what I haven't verified yet is whether the embedded binary is in the body or in the header. If it's in the header - or even if just the interpreter string is in the header then I might be good to go.

view more: ‹ prev next ›