... why
hoot
67% of statistics are made up
"Researchers say"
Researchers also say things they pulled out of their ass 90% of the time.
Source: I researched it
How do rambling blog articles full of terrible assumptions and analysis like this get posted? Is there an alternative technology community I could sub to that cares about quality content?
OP, I appreciate what you've done here. I lol'd, keep up the good work. A++ would tip again
I had to give my head an actual shake - this can't be a real comment. A normal, sentient human would not produce a sentence like this unironically.
The only explanation I can come up with is the OP is a first-year economics student.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." - Stephen Colbert
I'll be sending this article to my dev teams. It's right up there with "stop writing Helper classes".
This is some serious wharrgarbl. Doesn't anyone moderate this kind of literary trash?
This is the real scenario, right here. Everyone is so focused on increased disaster occurrences that it feels like this is invisible - until its not. Last summer Alberta was under drought conditions, and overall crop yields were 67% of the 5-yr average.
Less and less snowpack means less and less water to deal with worse and worse drought conditions.