hypna

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neither illegal immigrants, nor non-citizen residents get to vote. In what sense are they represented in either case?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Then they have a higher hurdle to clear. All I'm saying is it seems reasonable to give a state representation based on the number of citizens.

I got curious about the size of the issue. The numbers I found for Texas was an estimated 1.6 million illegal immigrants out of a total population of 30.5 million, or roughly 5%. There are 38 reps from Texas, so they'd lose one or two.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This doesn't seem like it ought to be all-or-nothing. Knowing the number of citizens and the total number of residents is useful for different purposes. Electoral votes: citizens. Disaster response: residents. And so on.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This mirrors how I've been thinking about the broader world trends. The neo-liberal world order is dying. It has solved all the problems it has the capacity to solve, and the people have run out of patience with the problems it can't.

The groups that have been best positioned to fill the gaps created by these retreating institutions are the ones that had always been excluded; nationalists, authoritarians, xenophobes of all kinds, et al. The left? They joined the neo-liberal coalition to try to change the system from the inside, or refused to participate and languished in obscurity.

IMHO if we're going to avoid a century of oppression, the left needs to abandon the neo-liberal coalition, and get into the fight for what comes next. We're already two steps behind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Sniffed the onion

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's roughly the total COVID death toll for that period. The term "excess deaths" is used to refer to the deaths which occurred above the typical yearly mortality rate. In other words, the deaths which are roughly attributable to COVID.

I don't know if that's what you meant, but it would be easy to read your comment, given the context, as saying that Trump caused 522,368 deaths in 2020.

If you want to quantify the deaths caused by Trump's mismanagement, you'd need to compare COVID deaths relative to population. I actually managed to find that (to my surprise)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/

If you sort by deaths per million (total), the US is 16th from the bottom right above Brazil, Slovenia, and Lithuania. And right below Latvia, Chile, and Poland.

You could also download that data set there, find the global average, sum up the difference between that and the US, and roughly say that number is the death toll for Trump's mismanagement.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Almost sounds like you're suggesting that people think that one party is more dangerous than the other merely because of partisan biases.

I'll readily agree that both parties suck. I will strongly disagree that they suck equally. It's not even close, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

I think there's a place for both. So long as none of it becomes mandatory, and online communities can freely choose to offer anonymous or verified identities, it's an idea worth trying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I played this so long ago, and every game has flaws, but I don't recall any big issues. What are the flaws you remember these eleven years later?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't believe I googled matoran feet just to find it's Bionicle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've been thinking recently that Lemmy would simply be better off without any comment votes. I've heard some instances disable them, but it still seems to be the norm. Group think already has enough pull given human nature. It doesn't need a boost.

22
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

We have the option to block posts by keyword, but communities have to be blocked explicitly by name. I'd like to be able to block all communities by keyword, or regex.

I have two use cases. The first is for communities that exist with the same name on many instances. The second is to be able block all the ".*meme.*" communities.

 

Pretty much title. I haven't had cable in a decade, and I'm not really a sports person, so I'd really rather not have to sign up for some sports streaming package, but I do kinda like watching Avs games. A friend asked me why I didn't just get an antenna to watch the games, but the broadcast TV page on the Denver Post doesn't look like they actually carry Avs games. Just wondering if I missed something.

2
Conversations with Tyler (conversationswithtyler.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

First thing I need to do is say how much I love the interviews that Tyler Cowen does. The topics range widely, and yet the questions are always remarkably well-informed, unique, and interesting. Honestly the greatest interviewer I know of. Give it a listen.

Secondly I'm curious if anyone else has an interviewer (who does podcasts?) that they would recommend.

view more: next ›