imaradio

i would be happy with a very no frills display if it meant a replacement could be purchased for a reasonable price. over the years I have collected a few devices that are otherwise functional but screen issue bricks them. this is my 3rd pixel in a row with fatal display problem. also google doesn't have screen mirroring via usb so you can't even use it for a secondary purpose. am totally done with pixels.

as long as you have a pixel and the right kind of pixel which is difficult to find.

and i found one! but the screen is fucked.

custom rom is the reason I spent so much time trying to get a pixel.

but I am giving up on this one. next device is going to run lineage so I can have a wider variety to try to find one that works. maybe I'll try a motorola.

there isn't swappa in canada

no it was a refurb business that didn't have exact item photos. Because the flashing is somewhat intermittent I wonder if it wasn't quite as bad when they were looking at it, maybe something got knocked loose in transit?

Previous transaction in similar circumstances have had better luck. I am not very picky about display quality or case damage so burn in, dead pixels, dim lines, dents, small cracks etc are no issue and I stop noticing them pretty quickly. I get cheap 5/10 condition phones and they are plenty good enough for me. I have never seen the bright white line thing. Also didn't realize that the display would be black where the cracks are; must be some great new display technology to prevent you from extending the life of a busted screen by applying a protector. Fantastic can't wait till all phones have this.

I think everyone's right I have to send it back. Very annoying.. it's harder to get this stuff in Canada if you are looking for custom ROM compatible phones. It's so much work to find the correct kind of item. Shipping takes forever. Oh well cest la vie. I guess I shall have to read another paper book.

TODO

I mean I don't want to take a 90% performance hit lol. I can def live with 10% hit.

ok, ok, I don't know how numbers work oops

I doubt the WAN would provide the advertised top theoretical speed most of the time; I just don't want to be running at like 10% of potential or something like that. If I were to do that I should at least get a cheaper plan.

just to check my understanding: a 4 port card provides different capability than a 1 or 2 port card with a switch attached, yes?

thanks for all the info!

i am definitely a person who will always change the defaults for no particular reason. so I appreciate the warning. except I don't quite know what you mean by "assignments". do you mean like the names? eth0? or their functions? I do like the idea of having a physical jack that's always guaranteed to allow access no matter what I foul up otherwise.

all these years I have been running my home network with a collection of routers just kind of attached together in a way that shouldn't work due to "double nat" according to everything I ever read, but it is pretty much functional if not at all optimized. maybe if you don't believe in double nat it won't happen to you.

thanks! so for example: Intel Gigabit Dual PORT GIGABIT ETHERNET PCIe NIC Card EXPI9402PT NC360T which is CA$30. Does that sound right?

What's a server card?

I'd prefer to avoid VMs if possible I never had much luck with them.