jsomae

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Perhaps you missed this: the meme says "if U.S. land mass were divided like U.S. wealth." It's a simile; it doesn't mean that this really is the actual ratio that U.S. land is divided.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

✊ fight back

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

the news about deepseek came out several weeks before the stock market noticed.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The world's largest semiconductor foundry, and one of the primary reasons the U.S. maintains a hold on Taiwan. There are rumours that the US has a plan to blow it up in case of Chinese invasion, that's how valuable it is. So this quite a reversal of strategy.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The funny thing is, this was unveiled a while ago and I guess investors only just noticed it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Handmaid's tale.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

(It should go without saying, but I obviously don't agree with Poilievre. I'm just noticing he seems to be taking a much less agressively anti-trans stance than other conservative party members.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I read that, it's amusing but the logic is flawed if sex is defined chromosomally. (Though if it's chromosomal, there's no point in defining it as being "at conception.") If it is defined chromosomally, then people with abnormal sex genotypes (e.g. Swyer syndrome) will be male by this logic, which I think not even Trump would agree with. So there definitely is a flaw with this definition.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not trans, but I am an ally and the reason for all of this is transparent. You're a scapegoat. But you're not alone, so survive and weather the storm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm well aware lol, I just think you did it better

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still think it's possible this was unintentional, and even more likely that it was intended to toe the line of plausible deniability. When I show this to people in real life, they are unsure, so I don't think it's as clean-cut and undeniable as people on social media are saying it is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can find people in a good mood, but not on Lemmy :P

view more: ‹ prev next ›