- Harris > Trump on Gaza (and the probability of actually effecting future change, notably).
- Harris > Trump on Women's Rights.
- Harris > Trump on LGBTQ+ Rights.
- Harris > Trump on Immigrants' Rights.
- Harris > Trump on Ukrainian Genocide perpetrated by Russia.
- Harris > Trump on Climate Change. (You realize this will kill more people than Gaza in the long-run, right?)
Moreover:
- Did Harris move the embassy to Jerusalem? -- NO,
- Did Harris tell Bibi to, "Finish the Job" like Trump? -- NO,
- Did Trump say that Palestinians deserve self-determination like Harris did? -- NO.
- Did Harris work to undermine the ceasefire agreements ahead of the election like Trump? -- NO.
- Did AIPAC and Bibi think Harris was better for them than Trump? -- NO.
Why was this not easy for you? It was CAKE for me, and I care about Gazans, too. There was no magical fairy-tale alternative candidate; this was a binary election. It seemed quite obvious that Harris resented Bibi and the actions of Palestine — but was between a rock and a hard place.
This made all the more obvious by Musk dumping over $70 million in ads into Pennsylvania alone, targeting both Jewish and Muslim communities with literally opposite attack messages on Harris. If that doesn't hint to the dilemma Harris was in in trying to win this election because of the fucked up Electoral College, then I don't know what to tell you.
Liberals didn't elect Trump, fascist, though. Does not compute.
Liberals also got the Civil rights Act of 1964 passed in Congress, despite MLK's prior Birmingham letter.
To equate American Democratic liberalism of today to German parties of the 1930s... Yeesh.