They're already doing this ALL the time. Even before the Trump administration, an average of one citizen gets deported every month, and if you don't have a lawyer on the outside fighting for you, you're fucked.
minnow
joined 2 years ago
It's stupid... If his actual goal was to help America.
But it's fucking brilliant if his goal is to help Russia.
You might be on to something there
I'd be shocked if they even bothered to hire any this time around lol
Huh. TIL.
I guess this is exactly what the judicial branch was created for. We've got an undefined area of legality, somebody's got to sort it out, and until they do we just can't say for sure one way or the other
Has he ever given any indication that he knows what the CHIPS Act is? Because I'm 99% sure he's confusing it with CHIP Children's Health Insurance Program which iirc is part of social security and we know he's aiming to get rid of that.
IMO you're overthinking it.
The Constitution applies to all people within jurisdiction of the United States. Immigration or citizenship status isn't a factor; he absolutely has a first amendment right to say what he said.
The question you're struggling with is regarding people who aren't already within the jurisdiction, or are applying for citizenship.
All of that said, if ICE already deported him then that complicates things. Normally somebody who's been deported will be denied reentry for that reason alone; there's a waiting period (5 years iirc) if they're ever going to be allowed back in at all. But you're correct that they could also deny him reentry for his political views. It's likely that, if he's already out of the country, legally removed or not, a judge will have to order him to be allowed reentry despite both of this things.
Approving the post and then locking it before anyone could comment would be a hilarious and fitting way to answer the question!
He already wants to send people to Gitmo, you don't have to sell him on it even more
Not quite true. The two party system is an organic result of First Past The Post voting. Since voting is determined on the local level (as opposed to the federal level) it'll be easier to change to Rank Choice and get somebody new elected that way.
Not "easy" mind you, but "easier"
This is the key component that the "vote third party" people keep missing.
view more: next ›
What do you mean? We've always been at war with Eurasia