mo_ztt

Right, I can see that. I was actually hyper-careful initially to set up sets that were flexible enough that you could use the tokens for a bunch of different encounters (that was the whole idea behind the "abstract" enemy tokens, just make colors and numbers so the battlefield is clear and organized instead of people having to match the token to the monster.)

I can't imagine that a library of specific tokens is all that useful on VTT, no. When I was setting all this up, I observed people who were attempting to make available "digital token packs" with hundreds of "tokens" for some small number of dollars, and I formed a theory that this was born more out of hope that people would buy it than any realistic interest in the product. For that reason, I made zips of the artworks to these tokens available for free, and based on the number of people I've observed being at all interested in the things when they cost nothing, I think my theory was correct.

Yeah, I don't think any political viewpoint is free from people who just like their prejudices and attack anything that doesn't match their prejudices. I wish it was different on the left, but sadly not.

FWIW, I've had a lengthy argument and said some plenty unpopular things in a tankie forum on Lemmy and didn't get banned, so we're still quite a ways away from the conservative ethos. I feel like as long as there's freedom of speech about it, the problem is self-correcting in the long run. Maybe.

(I literally had someone on /r/walkaway tell me that I could say whatever I wanted, that they believe in free speech absolutism and exchange of ideas etc etc, and then when I went to reply to them, I couldn't because I was banned. 😃)

If you are one of the people downvoting this comment - you really need to reexamine your way of thinking.

The dude is just trying to correct the factual record. If you look at that, and those facts are unfriendly to your collection of how you like to feel about the situation and so you downvote him/her or start a protracted argument with him/her about it -- that means biases are more important to you than factual accuracy.

I think, like any sensible person, that what happened to Breonna Taylor was a heinous crime and the cops involved should be punished. But, I also think the facts of the situation are important. She wasn't shot while she was sleeping.

Again, if you're downvoting, it means supporting your own biases is more important to you than the facts, and that's dangerous. That is exactly what the MAGA crowd does and part of what makes them so dangerous and so difficult to communicate with. So please don't do the same from "the other side."

Hm, maybe big rectangles for the vehicles? Whenever I did boats I would usually draw them on the map and have them as terrain... I could see tokens for it being really useful as long as they're big enough to fit everything yes. Maybe 10' by 15' for the carriage (two spaces up in front and 2x2 in the back) and boat, and 5' by 10' for a simple cart? Rectangular or odd-shaped tokens make everything more complex, but there are a bunch of great use cases for them so maybe it's worth doing...

Also, why hasn't he updated the story yet, and why are people upvoting the nonexistent story... I am being 100% sincere when I say that seeing a community of people upvote a story, when the actual link to the story is broken so you can't read it, makes me rethink what type of people make up that community and whether I want to be a part of it.

IDK, maybe it's some federation thing where he updated the story a while ago and the change just doesn't propagate properly or quickly or something.

Edit: Nope, not a federation thing, as of T plus 9 hours. What are y'all upvoting?

Yeah sure, you can edit post titles, but you have to remember that we don't yet have an unusable chat or a very limited selection of mascot-themed avatars. CHRIST WHAT WERE WE THINKING

All good, you can still go back and edit it to fix it.

Hm, that's a good thought... like just multicolored bases of some sort, and you can decide what different colors mean however makes it make more sense. I know you can get different colored plastic rings on Etsy and etc that are designed to snap around a mini / token and indicate different things about the creature, also.

I just recently started doing brass bases for some of the player tokens; in my mind they were going to be super popular and it would solve the problem automatically, because the creature tokens would have a totally different construction so it would be immediately apparent, but it seems like people are still into the wooden tokens for whatever reason 🙂.

One other idea which I think I might incorporate at some point is Sly Flourish's using letters for creatures and incorporating damage with the letter -- maybe I'm not explaining it well, but I really liked the idea:

During the game, when a character damages a monster, ask the player to identify an interesting physical characteristic of the monster they hit that starts with the letter of the token. Thus, the ghoul represented by the skull A token becomes the "ghoul with an arrow in her head". This way you have an in-game narrative that connects the story of the monster with the token. Skull A is a ghoul with an arrow in her head. Skull B is the ghoul with the bones sticking out of his back. Skull C is the ghoul with the caved-in chest, and so on. This is far better than fighting "ghoul A".

I actually have some vague plans to switch over to using letters for groups of creatures for exactly this reason -- this might be an idea that makes it easier to keep track of which creatures are badly damaged also (because the players have a lot more vivid conceptual reference of which one is which in their minds).

Article? It's just the image

Oh, I agree clearly it's a creature -- I'm just talking about how to categorize it in order to give it an art style. It's useful for a visual hierarchy if the player tokens on the battlefield are heavily distinct from the creature tokens so you can look quickly and say "blue = me, red and orange = other players, tokens with complex graphics = monsters" or something like that.

I think what I'm going to settle on is that the default style is that anything that's player related (players, horses, healing potions, etc) gets a white background, and anything that's monster related gets fully colored (either a solid color background or graphics all the way to the edge of the token). And mastiffs are "monster related" even though if you're hip you're going to be a halfling riding one. 🙂

This commentary is reminiscent of the radical right’s reactions to the Ruby Ridge incident of 1992, an 11-day standoff in Idaho between federal agents and the family of Randy Weaver, a Christian fundamentalist affiliated with the far-right white separatist movement. The standoff resulted in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, son, and a federal marshal.

Dude... Ruby Ridge was a big deal because the FBI shot Randy Weaver in the back while he was lifting the latch to his shed to see his son's body, and then kept shooting at him as he and his family was running back to his cabin, hitting and killing his wife while she was holding their baby. It was a huge deal for a lot of people, Randy Weaver was found not guilty of any "siege-related charges" and awarded $3 million in damages, and the DOJ extensively revised their policies as a result.

Craig Deleeuw threatened to kill the president, and then according to the FBI and I see no reason to doubt them, was pointing his weapon at the FBI when they shot him. Whatever Randy Weaver did to create the Ruby Ridge confrontation, I don't think it's fair to compare the reaction to that to the reaction to this.

Rght, this is really useful, thank you... a little falcon statue as the universal McGuffin token is funny to me, but I feel like that be immersion-breaking i.e. better to have various little object icon tokens and let people pick out their McGuffins individually.

Also, that actually just made me realize -- probably the object tokens should be sized consistent with the other tokens, e.g. healing potions and amulets and such should be considered tiny and get ½" tokens, chests and swords on the ground should be considered small and get ¾" tokens, etc.

(Also I'm still wrestling with the eternal question of whether a horse is a player token, a creature token, or an object token (since those categories have different color schemes / art styles to keep the battlefield visually organized). Currently horses are themed as objects, with mastiffs themed as creatures, but that's always bothered me slightly and I can't come up with a system for it that makes me happy.)