ninthant

joined 1 month ago
[–] ninthant 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Meta’s chief global affairs officer Joel Kaplan accused the Commission of trying to “handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards

We all see where this is going, right? Anti-competitive behaviour now being framed as “USA #1” patriotism and actively defended by MAGA via tariffs and trade policy.

People outside the US need to stop using American platforms.

[–] ninthant 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The liberals have released a costed platform and it contains no cuts to health care. This is publicly available.

Carney has spoken many times about the importance of the public health care system and their platform documented highlight this in many places.

Further, this press release misrepresents the role of a board chairperson, calling it “Carney’s company” which is wildly inaccurate. If you’re interested, Wikipedia has a good summary of the role of a board of directors. In no shape or form does it imply the sort of direct involvement in pursuing some privatization agenda as stated in this press release.

Finally, while not outright misinformation this article wildly overstates the importance of this Australian healthcare company to the behemoth that is Brookfield Asset Management. This company was acquired by Brookfield years before Carney joined, and based on the share price at time of acquisition is likely less than 1% of Brookfields holdings.

[–] ninthant 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

FFS can the NDP please quit it with the misinformation campaign please?

They can state their policies without lying. This is fucking gross.

[–] ninthant 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would have said the same thing until I saw this new meme format.

I’m not gonna pretend that the billions squandered and the environmental damage was worth the meme, but those are sunk costs so at least we get this out of it?

[–] ninthant 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Th argument for notwithstanding was that it would be used in matters of extreme importance, and in a thoughtful and limited way.

Now it’s being wielded by the right to push policy that feels good to vengeful idiots with no consideration if it would lead to good outcomes. And because Notwithstanding now framed as a left/right matter it will be impossible to get rid of.

So now we’re in a situation where in each election from now until the end of time, we have to convince a clickbait-hungry media and a population distracted by slogans and shiny objects that boring nerdy shit like notwithstanding is something that they must pay attention to.

This fucking sucks.

[–] ninthant 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“That sucks”

Sure but in the other hand a bunch of fucking assholes get a laugh about their funny prank. “That sucks” that it affects real human beings and makes it more difficult for them to exercise their democratic rights

I do not underhanded how people here are so jaded that somehow I’m the bad guy. Absolutely disgusted with this crowd

[–] ninthant 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a firsthand report of someone in this riding who is having difficulty helping seniors with mobility issues be able to vote.

I’m extremely fucking pissed at all the assholes who think “ha ha this is funny it doesn’t affect me”

It’s fucking gross. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

[–] ninthant -5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You know what’s a “bad look”? Protesting in a such a way that makes it hard for Canadians to exercise their democratic rights.

I’m not the one being bothered by this. It’s seniors and people with disabilities who struggle with a ballot that is well over a metre long. It’s poll workers who are affected by the struggle to accommodate the process of voting and tabulating the results.

It is causing issues. I know this from firsthand reports of personal friends who are volunteering in the affected riding. I’m happy to wear this “bad look” because it’s not me being affected.

[–] ninthant 2 points 1 week ago

The nuance I’d add is that while free markets are efficient, serving the public good is more important than the purest efficiency.

As an example, an unrestricted free market incentivizes the development of monopolies. This can be efficient and in the extremely long term these monopolies may fall to disruptive new entrants — but we humans live in the present and take little solace in the idea that the monopolist will someday get too bloated and fall. We just want to afford groceries!

So using competition bureau powers, we can restrict those markets. This may subtract from some extreme market efficiency but that’s an efficiency only the monopolist benefits from in a useful time frame.

The same principles are true in many other areas of the economy.

[–] ninthant 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s impossible to maintain so many competing “top priorities”

Trying to do too much and failing the execution was Trudeaus downfall, and the next PM will have even more to deal with as top priorities.

Pulling in climate issues to new trade partnerships and new housing policies is a way to keep progress towards climate goals while also keeping focused on practical issues we need to solve in the short term.

[–] ninthant 13 points 1 week ago

The debate organizers failed Canadians with this half-baked format.

Zero fact checking. Zero effort to stop people talking over each other. Zero allowance for Carney to response to the unceasing bald face lies hurled by all three others.

Just a complete and utter waste of time. No one wants this garbage, this is why so many Canadians don’t bother to tune in. In no way would anyone seeing this be better informed than when they went in.

 

The border between Canada and the United States is nearly 9,000 km long without bayonets or guns.

A border where neighbours in British Columbia and Washington state, Ontario and Michigan, Quebec and Vermont, New Brunswick and Maine, cross back and forth.

A border that cuts right through a library and opera hall. What a powerful symbol of shared values and traditions.

It’s just a line between neighbours—no big deal.

But no more.

 

OTTAWA, March 17 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump must stop making “disrespectful” comments about Canada before the two countries can start serious talks about future ties, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday.

"We've called out those comments. They're disrespectful, they're not helpful, and they ... will have to stop before we sit down and have a conversation about our broader partnership with the United States," Carney told reporters in London.

 

We, the undersigned, population of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to reconsider existing and future military contracts with the United States of America, especially the acquisition of new F-35s.

Petition by Charlie Angus

18
The beer can shortage (self.canadapolitics)
submitted 1 month ago by ninthant to c/canadapolitics
 

CBC and other outlets are discussing how the trade war is impacting aluminum cans. This highlights the perverse way we’ve structured our economy and how the trade war — while disruptive and causing short-term harm — will help drive longer term structural improvements.

On first glance it could be seen as unexpected that American levies on Canadian-made aluminium could impact our own beer cans. Pretty weird, right?

But no. We export the raw Canadian aluminum to the US, and then re-import it here. This makes sense for the companies involved— they can take advantage of the abysmal worker and environmental protections in the US and lower tax rates to maximize profit. And Canadians buy the beer anyhow; most (including me) not even knowing that it’s happening.

This system allows Americans and American companies to reap much of the value, despite not actually being strictly necessary. Their “value-add” is entirely from being awful, yet it works because of the structure of international trade.

So this system is really good for the US business interests, but is really bad for Canada. In order to boost our economy we lower the price of our dollar — making us poorer, our imports more expensive— in order to subsidize the exports of raw materials. And many of these raw materials are not renewable — once they are gone they are gone forever.

With the trade war we have a new opportunity. We can process our raw materials here. Yes, it may be a bit more expensive because we have labour laws and make our companies pay taxes and try not to ruin the environment quite as much.

But that’s okay — because the price is going up regardless. Deciding to make this structural change was a difficult pill to swallow because there will be people negatively impacted and this can be bad politics. But an idiot with no understanding of economics made this choice for us— a painful experience but also a blessing in disguise.

So yeah let’s process our own aluminum, our own oil, our own lumber. Process it here; capture the value here for Canadian businesses paying Canadian taxes and hiring skilled Canadian workers.

This will be a difficult period of adjustment, there will be hard times ahead. But someday soon those beer cans will be made in Canada. And on that day, we win.

view more: ‹ prev next ›