nostradamefrus

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
9
Help tricking my TV to stop "no internet connection" popups (alien.top)
 

My TVs are kept on a their own VLAN with only access to my docker host running Jellyfin and Channels DVR. I got a new TV recently which has a real annoying "no internet connection" popup that can't be disabled. My initial assumption was that I could watch its traffic and make DNS records for the hostnames it tries to contact that redirect to my firewall. Assuming it's just a ping check, that should do it. I have all that set up and pinging the addresses the TV tries to hit over ADB works fine.

hengshan:/ $ ping google.com                                                                                      
PING google.com (192.168.20.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.23 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.885 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=7.57 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.04 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=7.50 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.20.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=7.57 ms

I'm using defreitas/dns-proxy-server in docker as a simple listener and forwarder. The host is on the same VLAN with no internet access and is set to use itself for DNS. So the whole thing is one big loop. Again, assuming all the TV needs is a ping check, then this should work, right? Just a box that points all the DNS requests I've found to my firewall and the firewall echos the request, but I'm still getting sporadic "no internet" popups

Is my setup missing something or is it safe to say the TV is doing something other than a ping check to verify connectivity?

Game Thread: Minnesota Vikings (6-4) at Denver Broncos (4-5) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why am I viewing an ad about being a submarine builder

Is there a shortage of submarines I wasn't aware of

Game Thread: Minnesota Vikings (6-4) at Denver Broncos (4-5) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

BRANDY

You're a fiiine girl

(Such a fiiiine girl)

DOOOODODODOOODODOOOODODODOOODOO

Game Thread: Denver Broncos (3-5) at Buffalo Bills (5-4) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The New York Buffalo Williamses

The Colorado Denver Adult Horses

Game Thread: Denver Broncos (3-5) at Buffalo Bills (5-4) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When did Peyton get the 3d holographic chess board from Star Wars?

Game Thread: New York Jets (4-4) at Las Vegas Raiders (4-5) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, hear me out. 360 degree cameras built into everyone's helmet to get real time up close and personal data for penalties

I'll take my check now, Goodell

[OC] How the 2023 Bills offense is an analytics darling that can’t actually score points in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps not enough tables have been sacrificed?

Game Thread: Carolina Panthers (1-7) at Chicago Bears (2-7) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm honestly shocked this interview is still going lol I thought it was just a random cameo but they're really just talking about the Eagles ad nauseum

Game Thread: Carolina Panthers (1-7) at Chicago Bears (2-7) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't get the Jason Kelce hate. Travis seems like a nice enough guy but I'm tired of seeing him in every other ad like most of you guys

Game Thread: Carolina Panthers (1-7) at Chicago Bears (2-7) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who would win: An actual panther vs an actual bear

Game Thread: Carolina Panthers (1-7) at Chicago Bears (2-7) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who has more neck: Bagent or Mike Glennon

pfSense just messed with their userbase again, maybe its time to stop using it? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Clicked on this as a pfSense CE user and, gotta be honest, this post is more of a bait and switch than what Netgate did. This is absolutely a scummy practice, don't get me wrong, but putting up a thread about a company "messing with their userbase" sends up a lot more red flags than "they took away one free offering". This doesn't impact CE users, so your very loud rallying cry of "Are you willing to pay $400/year for your firewall software when youre only using it privately in your small homelab" is pretty overblown if you're acknowledging the target audience of this sub is largely people who can get away fine with CE

And what about Jellyfin's demise are you on about? I don't see any recent posts in here about anything going on with JF

view more: next ›