oji

You may share socialist views, but the path of Marxism is the path of materialism. Studying the works of the classics one will inevitably encounter a materialist dialectic that is incompatible neither with religions (a form of idealism) nor with agnosticism.

https://youtu.be/g4JQ7vIxdvw

What are you doing, stepdaughter?

there are 9-10 do and 64 don't in this area

https://docs.fluentbit.io/manual/pipeline/outputs/gelf

~~often~~ always

https://youtu.be/E7pfsneLSSM

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf

These are his early writings on theory, in which he takes a strictly Marxist-Leninist view. The rudiments of right-wing bias and so-called economism can be found in his other, much less popular work: https://archive.org/details/politicseconomic0000buch

https://archive.org/details/historicalmateri035186mbp - gentle (but not oversimplified) introduction for those who are interested in this subject. And another book recommended by the author (Nikolai Bukharin) to study before a historical materialism: https://archive.org/details/abc-of-communism_202102

Garfield saying "sorry"?!

*by the way