To clarify as these words are used differently by different folks, what does "women only" and " inclusive" refer to?
You shall receive your payment in the afterlife, meanwhile I'll take mine now. - a time honored tradition.
Post office, national parks, anything that can be sold and privatized to the highest bidder.
I can't abide a nation using debt to gain political or military influence over another nation. - an American
Seriously though, China just looking for their own Hawaii. Throw a military base there once they're in hock.
You have to be careful. It's like those bite-sized candy bars; when you eat 89 of them in a sitting you're still causing problems. I've found myself accidentally carrying up to 17 handguns at a time--i didn't even know I had half of them on me! I've had to develop good firearm hygiene, like flossing, a few times a day do a self-pat down to make sure a .357 isn't in my Crocs or a Desert Eagle .50 hasn't found it's way into one of my American Flag hoodie pockets.
I was trying not to be sensational but felt it should be higher as my made up stat, but decided lower and inarguable would be best since the internet loves to split hairs.
You may be right, you may not. My point is, whether him or something else, the point is to instill fear to chill such speech, and that will be successful regardless as it will go unpunished.
I mean, I think he will ultimately fail to affront the first amendment.
As has been eagerly demonstrated by for-profit companies and their lackies, many in the US are happy to self-censor. The chilling effect will be more than sufficient, as has already been shown, to subvert anything left of a "free press", and individuals will have all the weight of the economic and political power imbalance thrown at them to make an example and this will chill speech, as the Columbia Student kidnapping by the brownshirts shows.
Fauxnalism- make up a shitty portmanteau, generalize about an enormous group of people based on their age without any hard data, assert you have special insight into something that doesn't exist to divide and distract from real issues and generate clicks and outrage and profit. 50% of "news" in 2025.
Ironically, this article is fauxductivity it adds nothing to anything, and could mostly be AI slop.
I loved that they fed what is just boilerplate to the press while missing the irony of copying what the teacher said.
Also, sports teams are ok? I thought it was about learning? For profit billionaire owned wealth concentrating, public fund leeching, extremely segregated arbitrary loyalty-building exercises have much less of an appropriate place in school--and I quite enjoy athletics.