One big, sad problem in machine learning and AI is that many, hopefully not most, practitioners there are largely incompetent in statistics and probability. This is why they often incorrectly evaluate the performance before deployment.
pglpm
Does it really? sad. I was reading the "invite" process and can't say I fully understand it.
Papers can always be uploaded to https://libgen.is/scimag/librarian/ Many thanks to all the anonymous users who do.
Yes, though I think I also read it from other sources. But I want to read more and find out further news about those claims.
No, I stand corrected: the summary/snippet wasn't showing some of the quoted search words, but the page had all of them. Well done SearXNG.
Trying it these past days and I'm impressed!
I didn't know about this – that may explain the problem.
Nice initiative besides the search service! Thanks for sharing.
True about the good old-Google feeling! I want to find how much about of the shadiness claims about Startpage have been substantiated or denied.
Admittedly it could be a temporary fluctuation of some kind.
I tried Kagi for a while, but it was giving me less useful results than DDG, so I simply left it. I think it depends a lot on what kinds of searches one does, and Kagi is more useful for other users.
I don't understand why they keep saying "the Trump admin is doing this", "the Trump admin is doing that", and so on. It isn't the Trump admin: it's the majority of USA citizens that's doing this and that. They voted it. They're the first responsible and guilty. Each and every single person in that majority.