Rules often allow cyclists to go either way on one way streets
If it's folded while in your pocket or bag, why do you need hardness? Do you plan on folding a phone with sand on the screen?
On that note, I don't think I'll take my folding phone to the beach on my upcoming holiday
The ASD deleted the data, obviously after having gained access to the "bulletproof" hosting server
They also said they escalated through the hosting provider's network and removed other stolen data
And they got the people responsible on Interpol's wanted list
Isn't it reasonable for a maintainer to say "no rust here" when they don't know rust, don't want to learn it, and have decades of experience in C, and are maintaining that part of the system
Luckily we now have populations that eat only animal sourced food and populations who only eat plant foods
It'd be really good to get a prospective study comparing those groups, but in the last 20 years that there have been both of those, no one has compared either to the other. Both have been found to be better than the standard American diet, but just about anything is
I think the problem is there's religious need behind the effort to make meat look dangerous so more people go vegetarian, but there's no organisation behind the meat eaters
I hate going around city infrastructure (like temporary signs) in they bike lane
The only place on my commute where I interact with left turning vehicles (we keep left, so it's the same as your right turning ones) we have a bike lane which strongly implies bikes going straight ahead have right of way
When it's a car turning, I make sure I'm not going to be in the intersection until they are already turning
When it's a public bus, they wait for me before moving. I think our bus drivers get some instruction on how to act around bikes
The first one is based on epidemiological studies, correlation, not causation
The third one is comparing good diets to the standard American diet - high meat, high sugar. Since diabetes is a significant risk factor, don't you think it might be the sugar?
Your middle one says among other things:
Inconsistencies might be due to differences by setting; most studies showing a positive association were conducted in North America or Europe
So it's probably not the meat, it's the things western people eat with their meat.
Why meat comes up as a risk? People who are taking care of their health and watching what they eat, exercising they follow guidelines and don't eat much meat, but they also avoid pizza and avoid Coca-Cola, and avoid highly processed foods. The people who don't take care of their health are eating all those things, and meat.
You don't look down voted to me, you're on 1 point. I feel like you're contributing to the conversation.
They expect the pulverised rock to be spread by the blast and distributed on ocean currents, the CO2 is throughout the water column, it moves over concentration gradients, if one volume of water has 1g/L and another has 3g/L then CO2 will move from the 3g/L bit into 1g/L bit until they are in balance
I think they hope the pulverised rock will be spread so it works quicker, not having to wait for CO2 to balance
Government is fine. Remember money is just IOUs from the government, if billionaires assets were sold and the money went to government it would be deflationary, all money in circulation would become more valuable
Which instance is it on?
Summary (2 minute read): https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.127.4
Linked to the title is the full study. Image is figure 2 from the study.
view more: next ›
I think it might be the latter. I watched it for half an hour while JS was not in the lead, so I don't think it's automatic