A) Canada isn’t a viable country because they depend on us
B) Hey no stop you have to depend on us still…
puppinstuff
joined 2 months ago
Steve Boots said it well today.
Quebec: “Nobody gets to destroy Canada but us!”
Ah, that makes me feel a bit better lever-wise when you consider the logistics.
If dumbass stuck to a plan this time it would be the first. He’ll get pissy on Truth Social and blow it up to 25% between here and April 2. Then because he’s a chicken shit he’ll send a lower-level cronie to negotiate with a minister in Washington. Then after posturing we’ll be pausing for another month.
He has no new ideas. This is all he will ever try.
So tariffs until April 5 reversal. You can only play this card so many times, Donald.
Isn’t Facebook mostly for retirees playing freemium games nowadays?
As much as I’d love it I don’t think this is an option in 2025. The process is long and fraught with Hungary vetoes. And if the threat of an armed conflict turns into actual conflict we’d be exactly as Ukraine is now, blocked from proceeding because nobody in the EU wants to volunteer to inherit a war.
It’s a shame from a tariff response. Threatening to embargo fertilizer exports was a lever I thought we’d be able to pull before next planting season.
Next best thing is to export to other countries so we’re not competing with Russia in a rigged market.
Moe is a dick but he’s also correct that the US paying Russia for fertilizer will hurt Ukrainians.
I’m not Albertan but I believe the tradition is to vote for whomever gets the furthest out of the way of unfettered oil exports. I don’t think there’s much Smith couldn’t do as long as she keeps to that promise.
This will surely cost him votes in the next el—- oh wait.
This is the geopolitical equivalent of your idiot neighbours crashing your birthday barbecue only to complain about the food. Loudly. While chewing.
I wouldn’t mind some tit for tat. Carney could respond with Felon, Rapist, Laughingstock and they’d cut deep because they’re true.