When did Xbox last make a game Xbox exclusive?
ram
And nearly all PS5 games have to run on PS4. I fail to see your point.
If we find instances infested with bots and unwilling to deal with them, we defederate them. It at least makes it more difficult to mass-infest the network with bots if we have basic things like captcha, email verification, and applications implemented in all the major instances. cough
This fediverse at least. AT Protocol, used for bluesky, supports nomadic identity. Instead of accounts being @[email protected], they attach your domain / home instance / whatever, to a DID. You can read more about it in their various spec pages but here's the one for DIDs.
only wanted to make sure it was extinguished on other systems?
I hope you're similarly malicious about Sony's exclusives too.
The only time Sony's ever had stronger hardware was PS3, which was a dumpsterfire that never even ended in a profit. PS1 < NS4. PS2 < GCN. PS4 < Xbox One (by a small margin). PS5 < Xbox Series X.
The only thing they have to their name is a bit of code made for their platform and not others, and the opportunity to buy a $700 headset that's outclassed by a standalone $400 headset.
The best thing that ever happened to Sony was a) Nintendo using cartridges to solidify FF as a PS franchise, and b) Sega marketing Nintendo as "for kids" back in the 90s, a stereotype they've never been able to get away from.
MS isn't even top 2 in a hardware market of 3. They're not even top 4 in publishers either. Hardly a monopoly.
Bitwarden only autofills if the page’s URL is the same as the account in your vault. So it actually helps you make sure that you aren’t putting your info into a phishing site or something
This is true, though wasn't my concern. My concern is that it (and other PW managers ofc) can sometimes fill in fields its not supposed to, and you end up accidentally including a username or password in a GET header.
although, I’m pretty sure autofill is disabled by default anyway?
Auto-fill on page-load is, yes.
US Courts have already ruled in the past that human authorship is required for copyright. It'd be a logical conclusion as such that human authorship would also be required to justify a fair use defence. You providing a summary without any quotations would likely justify fair use - which is still copyright infringement, but a mere defence of said infringement. A machine or algorithm that cannot perform the act of creative authorship would thus not be exempted by the fair use defence.
Don't fill in this field, that turns your instance into a whitelist server. Remove everything from the allowed instances list
Nuke Studio