serenissi

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cause militia there have enough resources (these are state actors). Civilians didn't resist alone with their guns.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Not a physicist but fuck it is so relatable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

concentrate into the hands of the wealthy, and their militarized forces.

They already have weapons incomparable to those of civilians and also have resources to produce much more. Try to fight with military of any reasonably strong country with all the millions of guns of US citizens lol. This is such a bogus claim.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Unpopular opinion, these are handy for quickly installing in a new vm or container (usually throwaway) where one don't have to think much unless the script breaks. People don't install thing on host or production multiple times, so anything installed there is usually vetted and most of the times from trusted sources like distro repos.

For normal threat model, it is not much different from downloading compiled binary from somewhere other than well trusted repos. Windows software ecosystem is famously infamous for exactly the same but it sticks around still.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Invest in basic tools and have good relations with local repair persons, try to learn from them too as they fix stuffs. Hands on expertise is more helpful than theoretical how to knowledge. Also invest time in designing fail safe insect and paste management and plumbing. Bit of initial work usually pays off later.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah I only find this which is bit technical. Anything else seems marketing bs. Seems like they're making something similar to fuchsia by google but with linux abi compatibility.

Having linux shim alone makes it effectively monolithic like xnu.They even claim this by saying linux shim will hold global state in this otherwise microkernel.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you know where to find the HongMeng kernel? I couldn't find in OpenHarmony gitee.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump wasn't joking about gambling with ww3 unfortunately. He indeed has the cards but is stupid enough to play it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Exactly. Only thing here bothers me that why so many state reps still are on this shit platform.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's not .world. It's feddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Same, I though it is a fast drying ipa.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is the image not loading? Timeout in browser too, hence it's not my client.

 

I do agree it is not a dilemma to everyone. Still many believe that blocking ads harms creators supported by them. It is true for google adsense based platforms like youtube (youtube premium requires account, hence privacy implication).

Instead any content anyone watches can be rewatched with ads enabled.

In case a platform trust not logged in views less (as it might be on youtube, I am not sure) the privacy risk can be mitigated by having a -big enough) network of logged in account to 'view' the contents ad enabled.

What do you think?

17
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

First and foremost, this is not about AI/ML research, only about usage in generating content that you would potentially consume.

I personally won't mind automated content if/when that reach current human generated content quality. Some of them probably even achievable not in very distant future, such as narrating audiobook (though it is nowhere near human quality right now). Or partially automating music/graphics (using gen AI) which we kind of accepted now. We don't complain about low effort minimal or AI generated thumbnail or stock photo, we usually do not care about artistic value of these either. But I'm highly skeptical that something of creative or insightful nature could be produced anytime soon and we have already developed good filter of slops in our brain just by dwelling on the 'net.

So what do you guys think?

Edit: Originally I made this question thinking only about quality aspect, but many responses do consider the ethical side as well. Cool :).

We had the derivative work model of many to one intellectual works (such as a DJ playing a collection of musics by other artists) that had a practical credit and compensation mechanism. With gen AI trained on unethically (and often illegally) sourced data we don't know what produce what and there's no practical way to credit or compensate the original authors.

So maybe reframe the question by saying if it is used non commercially or via some fair use mechanism, would you still reject content regardless of quality because it is AI generated? Or where is the boundary for that?

view more: next ›