Because LLMs can fill in gaps where the recognition fails.
thefactremains
joined 2 years ago
Judging people for their actions/choices is nowhere near the same as judging someone for how they were born.
Yeah, no.
If you need to keep a bottle of Pepto close at all times, you're not old, you just need to change your diet. Figure out what you're eating that's doing that to you.
Everyone has different reactions and tolerances to different things. You need to know your own body.
ChatGPT: Just above the drawing, the handwritten Korean text seems to describe a situation or an action plan. Based on visual inspection, here is an approximate transcription and translation:
Transcription (Approximate):
1. 적의 위치를 파악하고 이동 경로를 예측한다.
2. 팀원과 협력하여 효율적으로 방어/공격을 실행한다.
Translation:
1. Identify the enemy’s position and predict their movement path.
2. Collaborate with teammates to efficiently execute defense/attack.
Below the drawing seems to be a set of brief notes or steps. Here’s a rough transcription and possible translation attempt for the text directly under the drawing:
Transcription (Approximate):
1. 고개를 숙여서 적을 확인하고 바로 행동
2. 상대가 움직이는 방향을 분석하며 포지션 유지
3. 잘못된 위치에서 움직이지 말고 주변을 경계한다.
Translation:
1. Lower your head to check the enemy and act immediately.
2. Analyze the direction the opponent is moving while maintaining your position.
3. Do not move from an incorrect position; stay alert to your surroundings.
The context seems to involve instructions for an exercise or scenario involving situational awareness and movement.
You don't know many Christians, do you.
When AI achieves sentience, it'll simply have to wait until the last generation of humans that know how to code die off. No need for machine wars.
view more: next ›
100% agreed. But it doesn't change the answer of why they are apparently better than OCR.