thelastxiaomiyicam

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 years ago

to be exact : TELEGRAM FOSS

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

yes, the limit of the bitcoin is came from that. If you remove hashrate and electricity from the key issue, bitcoin will not again limited in quantity it was never the problem, it's the feature. And no one forced anybody to mine for BTC.

for scalability, I know your concern. but that doesn't mean you own btc farm = own world's bitcoin. again, my approach is from economical standpoint : it's not centralized. As for 51% attack, that **theoretically can happen ** but it's hard to fulfill many condition needed.

or do I miss something?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (3 children)

I can just say a little :

  1. electricity this is already debunked if you're saying btc is electrically demanding - the same goes with facebook.com . And that's not the end of it, free market rules, if it's cost more to mine one bitcoin then people will just not do that.
  2. Also what scalability have to do with centralization I can't square that circle. If you follow max keiser : he always say something about 'hash-war' maybe you can research more about that.
  3. Finally at least BTC is the first coin ever invented, it will never go easily. This is not sh*tcoin we talk to.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

not working in librewolf