verdigris

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The GPU is using your RAM? Maybe you should post a screenshot of that page

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Try running an incognito window only, which should run without extensions (unless you manually enable each for private browsing). Check your usage then to see if the extensions are actually the problem.

Honestly 1.7gb of RAM for a modern browser is not that unexpected. Outlook is not a low-cost web service, first of all, but also the first tab is by far the most costly -- most of the RAM is for the browser itself. Even with ten or twenty tabs I wouldn't expect your RAM usage to balloon much, and if they're "background" tabs, i.e. tabs you've kept open from previous sessions but haven't actually looked at yet, they basically take no resources -- actually one of the areas that Firefox does a lot better than Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know that and you know that, but have you seen the sort of thing Trump and those who have his ear think is a good idea?

I don't think they'd just ban using all open source software, it'd be something ridiculous like asserting that all FOSS licenses are null and void and those projects are now the intellectual property of the US. Likely propped up by the classic "security" justification.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I'm less worried about any specific targeting of Linux than I am about some random tech bro whispering in Trump's ear and suddenly he bans Open Source or something similarly unenforceable and insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I have dailied Arch and Debian unstable and they both took about as much effort. Arch is really not that complex, it just gives you access to some potential footguns. Also, Arch absolutely makes it clear that it's a more advanced distro -- that's the entire reason for the meme, although these days it's a lot simpler thanks mostly to the installers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Having dailied both as well, I only agree once you're over the very significant learning curve. And even then, I'd say initial setup is pretty similar, if not a bit easier on Arch.

Arch and NixOS are kind of like C and Rust. Arch/C give you the power and flexibility to do pretty much whatever you want, but also will let you do it in very stupid ways that will come back to bite you. NixOS and Rust give you the same amount of power, but with a higher barrier to entry that ensures you have a pretty good idea of what you're doing, which results in a much more stable experience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As long as they're not for the core Fedora projects why not? Bugs for those should be scarce and there are many other users to report them anyway.

Using and contributing to FOSS is hardly scabbing regardless. Unless you're donating to the project I wouldn't consider even bug reporting as directly supporting IBM. The tangible profit to them is pennies if that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What's your point of comparison, Ubuntu LTS? Arch does not require nearly as much upkeep or attention as you're claiming. Try setting up a Gentoo or NixOS system, or better yet just do Linux From Scratch, and come back to us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Gentoo certainly teaches you a lot, but I would never recommend it to an average user. If you want to get any benefit from use flags for any packages, you will be compiling them from scratch and possibly their dependencies as well. Small packages are pretty fast, sure, but if you try to do something like compile Firefox, you could be waiting all day for that if you don't have a Threadripper or similar.

Practically, unless you run exotic hardware you're unlikely to get any actual tangible benefits from tweaking most use flags on most packages. Which begs the question of why you're using such a low-level distro in the first place...

Idk maybe I just didn't get it, but my month of running Gentoo was mostly just annoying. Again, great learning experience, but didn't make sense to me as a daily driver. It feels like it's for people who want to pore over the detailed patch notes for every package on their system, which is clearly not OP.

NixOS gives me enough control over how individual packages are configured if I really want it, but in a way that stays entirely out of my way until I specifically want to fiddle. I'm not saying NixOS is any better for a new user, but as a pretty experienced one I found it more rewarding once I understood the ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Turn off telemetry?

view more: next ›