tfney aren't even errors. They are the system working as designed. The system is designed with randomness in mind so that the model can hallucinate, intentionally. The system can't ever be made reliable, not without some sort of paradigm shift.
vrighter
the downvote wasn't from me
this isn't low effort. These are freaking great!
three, point, oh
for copy and paste.
Not one, but three point oh!
what trend? they made thi ipod, they made the iphone, they've been late, really really late, for very basic features on either. And a bunch of just plain bad stuff.
Butterfly keyboards, magic mouse, touch bar on macs, not cherry picked at all. There are tons of examples
so no. Before llms came around, lots of people were hobby programmers. We learned. Sorry to be blunt, but being a hobbyist is not an excuse. The best programmers I know are hobbyists
i haven't come across many. But i have written a lot.
you should own your data. So yes
to be fair this didn't break thne system either. It refused to update until you followed all 1 instructions
on the contrary, "temperature" is intentionally injected randomness in the process.
edit: which, to be clear] is not a good thing