I think you're overthinking it. Transgender isn't one particular thing, it basically just means not cis (and even then there's people who kinda identify with their AGAB and kinda don't at the same time), so it's impossible to get more specific while still generalizing to all trans people.
Personally, I don't strongly identify with labels, I only really care about labels in how they help me quickly communicate with people.
*******
What did you mean by that?
I was referred to get a breast ultrasound, but I was told what was going on.
Already sent to my friends :3
Do you want it to?
That last part was really confusing for a second until I remembered that not everyone thinks of transgender as an umbrella term that includes nonbinary.
You can hold a vote where he can choose the color of the knife, and even let him touch the handle (no actually moving it though, unless it's deeper)!
"Everyone's a little autistic"
- someone whose autismness is a rounding error from zero
At some point a difference in amount becomes a difference in kind. Very annoying when people trivialize it.
Cannibalism (ginger referring to a person)
"War on gender" sounds like something I'd do, lol. It's a shame his version is actually a war for upholding binary gender.
A guide for US government employees for the next 4 years, the CIA's Simple Sabotage Field Manual
Some more ideas:
I've seen many people take absolutists stances and throw accusations or insults at others who don't. While I applaud that they recognized serious problems, I want everyone to understand why I might take actions that seem to ignore or even worsen those problems: I only have so much power and so many options, none of which are ideal, so I do the best I can with what I have. I might prioritize stopping one bad thing over stopping another; that's not me excusing the other bad thing, that's me playing the cards I have to get the least bad outcome.
Personally, I base my moral decisions on expected outcomes. I would pull the lever in the trolley problem. I understand some people think me a monster for that, and I certainly wouldn't feel good pulling it, but I see it as me net saving people. I disagree with people that wouldn't pull it, but I see where they're coming from and I'm not mad at them (disappointed, maybe). Of course, as well as pulling the lever, there may be options to try helping the one person on the tracks, and we should definitely attempt such a rescue.
This whole topic can be applied to the do-i-vote-for-biden thing that this community seems divided over, but it's much more broadly applicable too.
Anyway, this is just me saying that I don't think the absolutist all-or-nothing approach some people take is a good idea, and I also don't like when some of them call me a bad person for not doing the same.
A diagram of a "bottom meson" (composed of an unknown quark "q" and an antibottom quark) with an arrow labeled ":3" pointing to a "double bottom Baryon" (composed of an unknown quark "q" and 2 bottom quarks).
Image taken from figure 1 of this article
Two (presumably) girls lying in bed holding hands and looking at each other. The one on the left, labeled "Me" has shoulder-length hair, an uncomfortable :| expression, and is wearing a black hoodie, grey jeans, and sneakers. The one on the right, labeled "Also me" has longer hair, a subtle smile, a blush, and is wearing a dress and high heels.
Edited from this post, on which I commented "I wanna be both".
Half Life 2: Episode 1, Direct Intervention
λ
Harvest their blood as punishment