Technology

63614 readers
4043 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
2
 
 

But the explanation and Ramirez’s promise to educate himself on the use of AI wasn’t enough, and the judge chided him for not doing his research before filing. “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Ramirez did not make the requisite reasonable inquiry into the law. Had he expended even minimal effort to do so, he would have discovered that the AI-generated cases do not exist. That the AI-generated excerpts appeared valid to Mr. Ramirez does not relieve him of his duty to conduct a reasonable inquiry,” Judge Dinsmore continued, before recommending that Ramirez be sanctioned for $15,000.

Falling victim to this a year or more after the first guy made headlines for the same is just stupidity.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
 

But it seems they only revlealed some of the code and not the engine nor assets.

So compiling the code could be pretty difficult.

13
14
 
 

We saw an interesting press release from the National Fire Protection Association, they released an EV firefighting video game for free with the help of a private developer and a Department of Energy grant. So far, more than a million firefighters have used the game to learn about fighting EV fires.

Well, that pitch was irresistible to us. We wanted to know more about how EVs work in emergencies, and we get to play video games to do it? Awesome, count me in, let the games begin. Here's how the game plays and what we learned from it.

15
 
 

AI Summary:

Overview:

  • Mozilla is updating its new Terms of Use for Firefox due to criticism over unclear language about user data.
  • Original terms seemed to give Mozilla broad ownership of user data, causing concern.
  • Updated terms emphasize limited scope of data interaction, stating Mozilla only needs rights necessary to operate Firefox.
  • Mozilla acknowledges confusion and aims to clarify their intent to make Firefox work without owning user content.
  • Company explains they don't make blanket claims of "never selling data" due to evolving legal definitions and obligations.
  • Mozilla collects and shares some data with partners to keep Firefox commercially viable, but ensures data is anonymized or shared in aggregate.
16
29
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

https://archive.is/2025.03.02-003524/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-01/deepseek-reveals-theoretical-margin-on-its-ai-models-is-545

Tap for article

DeepSeek Reveals Theoretical Margin on Its AI Models Is 545% - Bloomb…

Saritha Rai4:11 AM · Mar 1, 2025

DeepSeek that its online service had a “cost profit margin of 545%.”

Photographer: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg

Chinese artificial intelligence phenomenon DeepSeek revealed some financial numbers on Saturday, saying its “theoretical” profit margin could be more than five times costs, peeling back a layer of the secrecy that shrouds business models in the AI industry.

The 20-month-old startup that rattled Silicon Valley with its innovative and inexpensive approach to building AI models, said on X its V3 and R1 models’ cost of inferencing to sales during a 24-hour-period on the last day of February put profit margins at 545%.

Inferencing refers to the computing power, electricity, data storage and other resources needed to make AI models work in real time.

However, DeepSeek added a disclaimer in details it provided on GitHub, saying its actual revenues are substantially lower for various reasons, including the fact that only a small set of its services are monetized and it offers discounts during off-peak hours. Nor do the costs factor in all the R&D and training expenses for building its models.

While the eye-popping profit margins are therefore hypothetical, the reveal comes at a time when profitability of AI startups and their models is a hot topic among technology investors.

Companies from OpenAI Inc. to Anthropic PBC are experimenting with various revenue models, from subscription-based to charging for usage to collecting licensing fees, as they race to build ever more sophisticated AI products. But investors are questioning these business models and their return on investment, opening a debate on the feasibility of reaching profitability any day soon. 

The Hangzhou-based startup said Saturday on X that its online service had a “cost profit margin of 545%” and gave an overview of its operations including how it optimized computing power by balancing load — that is managing traffic so that work is evenly distributed between multiple servers and data centers. DeepSeek said it innovated to optimize the amount of data processed by the AI model in a given time period, and managed latency — the wait time between a user submitting a query and receiving the answer.

In a series of unusual steps beginning early this week, the startup, which has espoused open-source AI, surprised many in the industry by sharing some key innovations and data underpinning its models, in contrast to the proprietary approach of its biggest US rivals like OpenAI.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
view more: next ›