this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2021
50 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44656 readers
893 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

there's also actorDB which I think is more mature

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

This looks pretty cool, but is it completely P2P like OrbitDB?

Also, it looks a little bit abandoned: last commit was in 2019

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, doesn't look like it's actively developed unfortunately. It is fully distributed though, from the docs:

ActorDB on the other hand allows you to start out with a database that is fully normalised within an actor unit and scale that database horizontally over as many servers as you need. No single points of failure or global locks. Transactions only affect the actors that participate in them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

What I mean is that, OrbitDB seems to be open P2P (a network that anybody can connect to), while ActorDB seems to be private P2P

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

oh yeah ActorDB is a private P2P

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

actor db is literally abandoned though