AlmaemberTheGreat

I'm not saying they don't.

If I killed a man, would that make someone else killing a man any more or less okay?

If they need to resort to censorship to keep their ideas popular, maybe they aren't that great after all

It's not that there is no middle ground, it's just that systems usually ultimately end up with one of them

Causing a lot of fucking drama would be my best bet.

There's a difference between trying to preserve power by campaigning and through ÁVO/KGB/... style secret police services

So being invaded is now classified as colonialism?

What you call a "partnership" was rather involuntary. Not like we didn't fight a bloody war against it.

I love how you think you know more about my own country than I do.

Since when did the ÁVO* care about laws

Only if you don't know what being authoritarian means:

Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of a strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.

Normally you'd then vote the government out of office (or directly rewrite the law, like it's possible in Switzerland).

That is pretty hard though when there's only a single party to vote for.

Okay. So I'm gonna be here too. My knowledge, in this case, is from my older family members who where alive when Hungary was still a socialist/communist country (hardcode communist until 1956).

And I'll tell you, it was not good at all.

Which would be better because...?

I guess I will need to get crazy with UFW then