LocalLLaMA
Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.
Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.
As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.
Rules:
Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.
Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.
Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.
Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.
view the rest of the comments
AFAIK it is still a tuning of llama 3[.1], the new Base models will come with the release of 4 and the "Training Data" section of both the model cards is basically a copy paste.
Honestly I didn't even consider the fact they would not be giving Base models anymore before reading this post and, even now, I don't think this is the case. I went to search the announcements posts to see if there was something that could make me think about it being a possibility, but nothing came out.
It is true that they released Base models with 3.2, but there they had added a new projection layer on top of that, so the starting point was actually different. And 3.1 did supersede 3...
So I went and checked the 3.3 hardware section and compare it with the 3 one, the 3.1 one and the 3.2 one.
|3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | |
|
|
|
| | 7.7M GPU hours | 39.3M GPU hours | 2.02M GPU hours | 39.3M GPU hours |
So yeah, I'm pretty sure the base of 3.3 is just 3.1 and they just renamed the model in the card and added the functional differences. The instruct and base versions of the models have the same numbers in the HW section, I'll link them at the end just because.
All these words to say: I've no real proof, but I will be quite surprised if they will not release the Base version of 4.
Mark Zuckerberg on threads
Link to post on threadszuck a day ago
Last big AI update of the year:
• Meta AI now has nearly 600M monthly actives
• Releasing Llama 3.3 70B text model that performs similarly to our 405B
• Building 2GW+ data center to train future Llama models
Next stop: Llama 4. Let's go! 🚀
Meta for Developers
Link to post on facebookToday we're releasing Llama 3.3 70B which delivers similar performance to Llama 3.1 405B allowing developers to achieve greater quality and performance on text-based applications at a lower price point.
Download from Meta: --
Small note: I did delete my previous post because I had messed up the links, so I had to recheck them, whoops