this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
-5 points (42.4% liked)

Casual Conversation

2045 readers
234 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The plague of NIMBY's may yield if a real plan is put in place to rebuild better. Vast areas could be rezoned for density. A way of addressing the enormous number of displaced people could also address the largest homeless population in the USA. The city that defines urban sprawl could be redefined. How does this play out?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It would be if fire codes and improved materials are required. The problems arise from poor overall standards across scattered development. There were pockets of new and old. That will not be the case in these areas moving forward.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqq8-2ereKg

Reminds me of this concrete geodesic dome that survived previous fire seasons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That is pretty awesome. Thanks for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh... I should add, it wasn't a total success, the power poles supplying the building burned down in the fire - so they lost electricity.

A great demonstration of building for the environment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think buried power lines would work better. Now would be the time to make that happen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

You'll like the Pensacola Beach UFO house. That thing his withstood loads of hurricanes. Also note that it's cinder block. All the 50s houses built like that are still around after the McMansions get wiped off the face of the Earth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you like, live in LA? I’m six miles from one of the fires and I can tell you now that putting up a bunch of dense housing where the fire was will totally not prevent fires in the future. The Santa Ana winds will continue and they’ll do so a lot more strongly if we don’t actually tackle climate change.

Probably the housing stock there shouldn’t have been built there in the first place, but they weren’t aware decades ago that we would have an event like this but now we do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I live in Orange County in the same type of dense mess. There are plenty of standards and materials for buildings that will not burn. Building in the crap toothpick and papier-mâché style with no regulations for non flammable materials is the problem.