shinigamiookamiryuu

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How so? This is the first I'm hearing of such a thing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Who is Xitter Link?

 

This comes in response to news that I've heard of recently. Goes to show if you value your posthumous requests, organize them wisely.

The concept we generally call "dying wishes" are a staple in how we think of society. Just look to the ancient play Antigone for that. However, things don't always go as planned, especially in the wrong hands. What's the biggest difference you've seen between someone's "dying wishes" and what actually ended up happening?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

You could always keep food preserved how ancient peoples did. For instance, Romans would build ditches and store their food in, and some people would keep it preserved by having smoke flow over it 24/7. The need for refrigeration is surprisingly modern even if only because the other methods can be a piece of work.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It took me a moment to realize what you meant. I knew it was ironic but thought you meant you were too poor to pay for electricity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Lucky. Most of the world currently deals with rulers that are far from great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As a form of entertainment, why not?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

Yes, solitary confinement in a detention center. I got to give him credit, I would've expected him to be like a lot of tycoons and worm his way into some sort of comfy quasi-prison.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

It sometimes seemed that way. It's not as common now for the discussion to come up in the 2020's (maybe someone gave them what they were looking for, considering the opposite is now trendy), but it was common for them to say, for example, that they require some kind of physical trace in order to not hold God in doubt but not carry this over for things like historical figures.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am what many would call a relationship anarchist. That refers to the argument against default norms. If two or more people are in a relationship, is it not up to them to decide its terms? By this line of thought, assuming the person you're dating has no moral obligation to who they share a marriage document with, and they are fine with you dating them, and you're fine with it, by definition it's all fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I mean that's kinda the reasoning. But who ever said I was American? I just know there exists rules and a predisposition to go from A to Z at an unrestrained pace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

And you don't expect that to make you just seem defensive about radicalism, even at the cost of rationale?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I imagine it still would inspire equal caution, no? I know there are a lot of people from there who have had sympathies towards people who have recently become known for that (which no nation is really unique for right now). It has become so visibly precautionary that almost nobody shies away anymore from the urge to avoid them in their communities. As is how it should be.

 

So I've been known in the artist community for a while, going by several different names in several different subcommunities. In terms of expectations in precision, I'm not the most realistic, but I can visibly convey things well. My contributions are also communal, and the only expectations to those who want a piece of it all are that credit is given and that earnings made with the art by those with their needs fulfilled charitably give away those earnings.

Growing up, I've noticed a lot of people do their creative contributing in ways that one might say experimental. There was a popular cartoon that ended before my time but which I was able to watch the tail end of in the form of reruns, one called Home Movies. I'm sure several of you know it well. Most known for graphics that are very, erm, interesting. Like it looks like a first draft of Phineas and Ferb (and maybe it is). Nobody truly questioned it though. It was just there. It was looked back upon as being considered a "positive" thing. A lot of cartoons were like this (again, bringing up Phineas and Ferb here, along with Billy and Mandy, Regular Show, Chop Socky Chooks, The Simpsons, Ed Edd and Eddy, South Park, Angela Anaconda, Reboot, and Doug, all in their own ways).

Imagine, then, an independent, non-studio-affiliated hobbyist who, in a related manner, does not catch on to every factor.

Everyone suddenly goes into "roast mode" upon seeing it and hearing the context. "Leni" said an acquaintance of mine about my recent art project which is a part of a "life story" serial, "why did the person you commissioned to draw you and your same-age friends in your preteen years draw you wearing a ten gallon beret? It's not that big, unless you're all riding the subway from Paris, Texas."

"But, but Home Movies--"

"But that's Home Movies! My gal, people gotta learn. Sleep on it. Just not in the way you do there though, you'll get knocked over by some thug."

I get this a lot; the expectations are different in the two spheres. What, then, is a "good" deviation from normal creative precision, maybe versus a "bad" one?

 

What have friends of yours or members of your family chosen for each one? Someone I know is having an event and it has me wondering.

 

I was in an incident that led to people complaining about me here and by extension in Ask Lemmy, one which I explained my perspective on elsewhere. Then, when sharing my perspective, I was asked by a certain Blaze to share it in YPTB, only for those in charge there to give what amounted to a signal of disregard for it and to take it elsewhere. Going by their own words, I then shared it in [email protected] as the only close alternative available, which, as a part of their own "rules subtext", sometimes allows this, and the person, if not all of those who help with YPTB, proceeded to drop by anyways and scold me because "YTPB has specific posting guidelines in the sidebar".

The implication here is false, at least by my definition of the word "false", and he even alluded to that after it began to be discussed elaborately, albeit before using an appeal to the masses (story of my life) and say "most people seem to understand", which ignores consensus of me and the aforementioned Blaze (as much as the "the truth we all wanted to speak" remark ignores not everyone had that issue). Notice how I responded with "I can spot rules broken by the other person’s thread more easily than I can spot rules broken by mine" and got only thumbs down for it and no responses, yet when I actually dissected the rules piece by piece in front of him to point out that any rule I supposedly broke wasn't there, which even the person who recommended I make the discussion in the first place (the aforementioned Blaze) agreed was a "fair point to be honest", the mod then delved into the concept of "unspoken rules" as an excuse for himself and said he didn't want to "rules-lawyer", which not only disproves what he said about "specific posting guidelines" being "in the sidebar" that supposedly explained what I did wrong, but proved a point I commonly mention about people in different places including here always being uncritical and unwilling to see things for themselves and just taking peoples' word for things (and about that, to respond to Cypher's last reply, intellectual =/= intelligent). A part of that is it also suggests, by extension, that the quantity of thumbs down you garner is unreliable as consistently meaning anything, unless the rule is actually to apply gladiator logic and say a thumbs down signals mercy, as indicated by the very Roman-esque culture around here. I guess all this time, I was being praised and didn't realize it?

This idea of "unspoken rules" and "reading between the lines" seems to be a common theme here because everyone seems to think that concept is valid, and they think that whether you're akin to an outcast is defined by the norms you follow. This makes me curious to ask... hypothetically, if I get all PTB gradings from everyone because I couldn't read the "unspoken rules" or anticipate mod discretion, what if I were to go to the places I have authority over and ban everyone who says or has said anything positive or supportive about Luigi Mangione or what he did? Would I be able to accomplish this without being called a PTB? After all, that is how this all started, and again, that would be an "unspoken rule" on its own that can be chalked up to mod discretion, now wouldn't it? Those are the terms.

I await your choice.

 

I am often intrigued by how widespread a lot of extended and even non-extended families are, and it's fascinating to think of family members coming from different places to visit each other and having family gatherings with a bunch of different accents. What countries do you have known family members in?

view more: next ›