this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
45 points (92.5% liked)

Nintendo

18945 readers
151 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20 [Switch 2 Direct] | Apr 02 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's just so out of context, like what is this trying to say about the game? 😆

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Please don't blame the politicians who are trying to protect us from big business over big business that doesn't care whether they poison us as long as they make money.

There isn't an effective mechanism to determine how carcinogenic or teratogenic every application of every substance is. There's simply way too much variability. Knowing that a product contains chemicals from California's list (roughly 900 I believe) of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects gives you the information you need to make decisions about how you use it. If something has this label, don't let your baby put it in its mouth, for example, or don't sand it down and breath in its dust, or wash your hands after you use it before you eat.

This warning is fantastic and is not supposed to give you all the information. It only tells you that one or more known dangerous chemicals are present in a product, which is still invaluable information.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

More than once I’ve heard the jokingly saying that ‘everything causes cancer in the state of California’ (regardless if they bore the warning label or not). I think while the intention may be good, the equivalent of notification fatigue is at play here and might not be delivering intended benefit/value.