this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
41 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5891 readers
328 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
41
Leaders at Davos Economic Forum Vow to ‘Stay the Course’ on Climate Action (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't consider it doing pretty well, when we're exceeding the Paris agreement right now and they're still saying we're trying to keep it. Fossil car ban is far too late. Carbon certificates far too cheap.

But yes, she's not fully blocking anything. However, she's also the person to present for the conservative parties to keep up appearances, while at the same time these parties are ruining any climate ambition. But could also be, that she falls into the same category as the UN people. But why is she not publicly strongly disagreeing with her party or joining other parties?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

But you don't understand! AI takes a lot of energy, so companies HAVE to miss all of their reduction goals! What if they miss out on money!

/s