this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
189 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7495 readers
773 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That's outright not true. You can claim Kamala wouldn't have tried hard enough to stop the genocide but she did NOT openly support it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

She also supported a ceasefire and two-state solution. Yes, she was more pro-Israel than I'd have liked, but that doesn't mean she's anti-Palestine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She supported continuing arms sales to Israel, which is a crime. It’s a violation of both domestic & international laws. And we know the White House attorneys made the administration aware of this.

There’s no way to double talk out of this one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How exactly was that doublespeak?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You’re asking how claiming to support a ceasefire, while declaring a commitment to continue illegally arming the genocide, is doublespeak?

…Do you know what that word means?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I was asking how what I said was doublespeak, since you directed it towards me, not Kamala. Unless I misunderstood?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)