this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
188 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7452 readers
467 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That’s nice, Bernie. Now can you please stop voting to confirm Trump’s nominees?

It’ll be easier for people to believe he’s not a king when you stop bowing to him.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is he actually confirming the nominees?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

What the fuck the Bernie?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think this might be because they're worried that if Rubio doesn't get it that Trump will nominate someone even worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t care. We cannot continue this ’lesser evil’ bullshit. Look where it’s gotten us.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ignoring the "lesser evil" route got us Trump and his cabinet. Good for us. Things will get much worse much more quickly. There's not going to be a revolution or some great reset. Just oppression. Hard miserable oppression.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Both candidates were openly supporting genocide in the last presidential election. Neither were a lesser evil.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So you are saying things would be exactly as bad had Harris or Biden won?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m saying both would’ve committed the same crime, and killed just as many Palestinians.

I’m a socialist. I don’t participate in the Red & Blue MAGA obsession over which flavor of demagogue should be empowered and worshipped.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's all well and good, but it's also not the question I am asking. Assuming your statement is correct, are you saying everything would be just as bad as it is or is going to get with Harris or Biden?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know. I guess it depends on your demographic. I don’t see how dying under a Democrat is better than dying under a Republican. Once it’s bad enough, the degree of how bad between the two is irrelevant.

If the only options are Hitler or Mussolini, the only correct choice is to fight the entire system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do you actually think the same number of people would die under Biden or Harris? Assuming your comparison is entirely correct the conclusion implies a singular choice. Fighting the entire system can happen in every scenario. If voting for the lesser of two evils is able to reduce the harm to a few people or buy time to fight the system then that seems like the better choice. Mussolini only caused the deaths of thousands, not the millions Hitler did. Maybe at that level those are just statistics, each and every person between those numbers has friends and family that would disagree.

"While evil triumphs and your rigid ideals crumbles into blood stained dust the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns".

I despised Biden and Harris. Voting for them brought me no joy. However I can say that I am already seeing additional harm being done that was not before Trump won.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Is there anything the Dems could possibly do that you would be unable to stomach? Unable to participate in to any degree?

If yes, why isn’t it this? If no, you are in a cult.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Anything that results in more human suffering than the alternative. Like I said before one is demonstrably worse than the other. We don't live in a movie or book. I'm going to keep fighting the same I always have, and I can do that WHILE choosing the option with less suffering.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's outright not true. You can claim Kamala wouldn't have tried hard enough to stop the genocide but she did NOT openly support it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

She also supported a ceasefire and two-state solution. Yes, she was more pro-Israel than I'd have liked, but that doesn't mean she's anti-Palestine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

She supported continuing arms sales to Israel, which is a crime. It’s a violation of both domestic & international laws. And we know the White House attorneys made the administration aware of this.

There’s no way to double talk out of this one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How exactly was that doublespeak?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

You’re asking how claiming to support a ceasefire, while declaring a commitment to continue illegally arming the genocide, is doublespeak?

…Do you know what that word means?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Bernie never fails to disappoint when he is needed.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He is not a king

People sure do act like he is

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The timeline where Gore won the election he actually did win then handed the reins to Bernie has warp travel and human/alien babies by now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I sometimes wonder if we're in the wrong timeline like on that episode of NextGen where Tasha Yar was never killed, they encounter the Enterprise-C, and Guinan tells Picard "it's not supposed to be like this, there should be children on this ship," or words to that effect.

However, people probably felt that way too when JFK was shot; from where I'm standing, the real fracture in the timeline occurred on 9/11, and things have only gotten more batshit crazy and fractured as time goes by.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That seems entirely possible. For all we know these ghouls in the GOP are actually the Loom in human form just consuming all the life in this dead end timeline. We need a Crusher

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

We got the timeline that happens when we allow things to happen for decades without protesting (the European way) when politicians try anything the first time.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Bernie's too good for us. He could have done way better imho...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

If you get all the levers of government under your control - you kind of become a king.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

If it quacks like a duck...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If something isn't done this year he will be

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, the founding fathers made a constitutional monarchy in all but name. Every president keeps fucking with what little constitutional restraint they had in the first place and face no consequences (only to pretend they're widdle powerless and restrained bois when politically expedient), all that happened is the veil has been lifted.