News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Life's more complicated then that, try not to alienate the people that need convincing.
No, they have blood on their hands too. Sure they aren't covered in it like MAGA Carrie, but they didn't take 30 minutes out of their day to vote to stop this.
I would add one big caveat to that: voter suppression. Voting day isn't a holiday, many MANY people have to work, and between Republicans doing all they can to make mail-in ballots inaccessible and closing polling stations to the point where people are standing out in the heat for upwards of 4 hours to get into a place to vote, let alone purging voting rolls so close to the election that there wasn't enough time for people to register again (and nonsense voter ID requirements), I can't blame some people for outright not having the ability to vote.
Anybody who had the ability to and chose not to? Yeah, blood is on their hands. The time to push for the changes that everybody wants is not 3 months once every 4 years, but the time leading up to those 3 months.
They also threw out over 2 million mail in ballots this year and black voters were nine times more likely than white voters to have their mail in ballots rejected.
Voting isn't a holiday in Canada either but we make it work. Vote early, vote by mail. You can use whatever excuse makes you feel better but taking an hour or 2 out of your day once every 4 years is a small price to pay for democracy.
And 100% of Canadians vote, right? And 2 million+ of those mail-in ballots get thrown out, right? And those are only available in certain provinces anyway, right? And people stand in line for 5 hours, right? And there are only 2 polling locations per city, right? And there's no issues with indigenous people being disenfranchised by the government, right?
It's almost like Republicans actively make it as difficult as they possibly can for people to vote. And I sure as hell am not going to blame those people who had their ballots thrown out, or stood in line for 5 hours only to get turned away because they closed the polling locations early (illegally, I might add) or didn't have some esoteric form of ID that they didn't know they needed because Republicans had quietly passed a Voter ID law in the state without sending out any notification to anybody - and then largely only demanded it from people who "looked too Mexican."
Again, those who actively chose to stay at home and not vote? Blood is on their hands, fuck 'em. But there's tons of people who actively voted and had their vote thrown out or were denied the right to vote, and I'm not gonna put them in the same boat. Voter suppression in the US is bad, and it was even worse this past election. To the point where there's questions about whether or not the election was tampered with. But go ahead and keep blaming the Jews for not voting against Hitler hard enough.
To be fair, you guys have a parliamentary system. It's a bit different, and you don't have any one election that's equal in scale and importance to our Presidential election.
Not making excuses, just saying that it's not a 1:1 comparison.
I don't really understand what your point is. Do you mean our election campaigns don't last 4 years? Y'all could plan to book voting day off 20 years in advance because it's not a surprise, ours can pop up any time with a month's notice. And by importance do you mean our PM generally doesn't have the power to crater the world economy in a matter of days? Or are you saying ours are more important because we vote for the entire government on 1 day and you just pick one guy?
I would argue the fault lies entirely with the political party that alienated their constituents to such an extent that some of them actually withhold their vote knowing 4 years of lunacy could be the consequence.
Hard to pretend people that felt conflicted about genocide are the villains here, even if I wish they would have made the smart choice.
I would argue that being a single issue voter who is willing to make everything worse, including that single issue they are so fixated on, is just as fucking stupid as being conned into voting for Trump directly.
Yes, FFS. This.
Not only that, but the Republicans are highly likely to be far, far worse on foreign policy in general, and about Gaza/Israel in particular. Demanding a pretty pony and when it doesn't show up, ceding the field to the likes of donvict is criminally stupid.
Even if the single issue is being complicit with crimes against humanity?
The choices available were "not doing enough to stop it" and "actively participating". In this instance, not voting was equivalent to choosing the latter.
No the choices were "loudly support" or "quietly support" crimes against humanity.
Well, it wouldn't have been an issue if Biden and Harris hadn't supported it.
They chose to continue their support for Israel's slaughter (and immigration crackdowns, and pro-corporate policies, and just about anything they could use to fuck over the average American) even though polling told them they were going to lose. They knowingly handed the government over to Donald Trump (a second time) and Elon Musk and you're sitting here telling people they're fucking stupid for not being on board with all that. That sounds pretty fucking stupid to me.
You're just giving them cover to go even further right next election and who will you blame when they lose yet again with their watered down right-wing policy that appeals to no one?
I've said it a thousand times but it's always worth repeating: the election is about damage control. You choose the least worst option available to you. If you don't like the choices you see, you have to get off your ass and do something about it before the election. Whining about after the fact will accomplish nothing.
"Damage control" means both candidates are damaging to varying degrees, so what do you expect people to do once they realize that it doesn't make much difference who gets elected? Why do you think a majority of people don't even bother to vote anymore?
How does the rubber meet the road with this strategy exactly? I'm guessing it just means you blindly support the Democratic party regardless of the candidate and their policies, no? They can force on us a geriatric candidate who can't even get through a single debate or make hard right shifts like they did this election and you just cheer them on and give a thumbs up, correct? Those that don't offer blind support get turned off by this and the Democrats lose yet another election and allow Trump back into office a second time and you still blindly support the direction of the party? That's insanity.
Who exactly do you think is whining here? I knew this was coming. The polls showed it was coming. You guys are the ones whining and trying to blame everyone else except for the party and their candidates who keep losing. I've been preaching this same shit since 2016, while an army of sycophants have emboldened the DNC leadership into adopting worse and worse policy even though it backfires on them (and the rest of us by extension) every single time.
Here we are before the next election and what are you doing to change things other than pledging unconditional loyalty to a nearly thrice losing strategy. What do you think you're accomplishing with this?
Fair. My use of the word entirely is a bit much. I guess I just see the dems as having more control over the situation with non-voters just reacting to their choices.
It sucks we all have to suffer for it.
You're not the first one to argue the fault lies (entirely or mostly) not with the candidate and party aligned with doing the bad things but with the candidate and party who didn't do enough to stop the ones aligned with doing the bad things.
So, you're not alone in being wrong.
I'm saying the election loss isn't the fault of people that boycotted the vote because of the genocide, but it's instead the fault of the party that is supposed to represent them but chose to represent genocide instead.
I kind of feel like you are trying to twist my words here?
Let me make myself more clear. The election is the fault of the people who voted for Donald Trump.
Nah, that's a shit take. If you didn't vote, you're at least okay with the prospect of another Trump presidency, or you didn't care enough to vote against him. You're complicit either way.
I don't know - in some parts of America, getting out and voting is made more difficult. On purpose.
We all saw that voting by mail can work during Covid. The qons want to claw that back.
Some things that are necessary are also hard. If you don't do something necessary because it wasn't as easy as you thought it should be then you're a piece of shit. Nothing will change until Americans collectively decide to make good choices in spite of the difficulty and you're making that take longer by helping people feel justified in taking the lazy way out.
For my state, voting is as it should be - by mail, and it's been that way for years and years.
I know in other states, they are doing everything possible to make it hard for people of certain races/classes to vote. I'm just showing some empathy for that, as my current system here in Colorado is fantastic - I have time to sit and leisurely and exhaustively review each item on the ballot and fill it out without any hurry or worry about rushing back to my job. I don't have to stand in line for hours and know that people can be fined for giving me water as I stand out in the hot sun.
I would agree, given the stakes, that people should do everything possible to do their part to vote against someone like donvict. I also realize that, in practice, there are forces working to make that much more difficult for some people. Since I've not had to physically wait in line to vote for a very long time, I think I'd feel just a little bit hypocritical to demand that of others and not acknowledge the effort others have to put in that I now do not.
Hard disagree. Those who didn't vote said exactly what they stood for. Dems had the power, and completely ignored it and didn't get voted in as a result.
If you're blaming non-voters you're just causing unnecessary division amongst the left. The US has been fascist for a long time. And everything happening has been a long time coming. Trump is a symptom, not the cause.
Also, in many states, the Republicans insist on making voting more difficult, especially for certain people.
We should have vote by mail, everywhere, with ballots sent out well in advance. And people should be automatically registered to vote when they get something like a driver's license.
Fuck you, you grammer nazi.
How about a modification to the statement like this: People that didn't vote for him let those that did decide to vote for them.
How is that alienating anyone?
Also I don't think most of them can be convinced of anything that will improve tomorrow.