this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
449 points (98.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

972 readers
721 users here now

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There have been studies on this, brain damage is linked to more conservative political beliefs.

It is not ableist to point out a fact.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2020.0137

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I had a TBI as a teenager and went from moderately liberal to full blown anarcho communist.

You meet one person with a brain injury, you’ve met one person with a brain injury. We’re all very different because the brain is barely understood by science and our injuries even harder to quantify.

Also if you look at sufferers of CTE most become aggressive and violent until they end up taking their own lives. See boxers, football players, combat veterans. I think there’s a link between aggression and right wing ideology.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine TBI is going to be more variable in its effects than something from constant low level brain damage (chemically or impact) or from a stroke as well though right?

If my assumption is right, then that would likely explain why you are an outlier, rather than that brain damage's effect doesn't at least trend conservative.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

No, whether blunt force trauma (me) or lack of oxygen (fetterman) the exact parts of the brain affected vary from person to person and that would impact political leaning in theory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

So, liberal to authoritarian? Figures.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

Anarchists are not authoritarians.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Wow. Anarchist and authoritarian in the same sentence. That’s a new level of political illiteracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Technically speaking, on paper both anarchism and communism advocate for the reduction of central powers that dictate authoritarianism.

In real world practice however...yeah :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In what real world context are anarchists authoritarians?

Fake ass ancaps don’t count.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I was referring to the modern day social media "anarchists", yeah. I am a survivor of r/politicalcompassmemes.

I think most real world anarchists aren't arguing on corporate social media for obvious reasons. Therefore it gets co-opted by the libertarian/ancap community, the misrepresentation of the philosophy perpetuates, and then we have comments like the one I was replying to calling it authoritarian. Hence my :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah, that whole wing of politics doesn’t count as anarchism because it doesn’t challenge capitalism which is extremely hierarchical.

Edit - to anyone reading this who is confused, anarcho communism is essentially the embrace of communist economic organization and the rejection of authoritarianism to get there. Different anarchists have different views about the how but at our core we are against hierarchy in all forms.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Do you know which exact type of brain damage he suffers from? Because it states while damage in one affected area can have an effect on your political opinion, damage in different areas show no difference whatsoever. It wouldn't surprise me to see if other types of brain damage could make you more liberal too. We do know liberal and conservative brains show some differences, so different damage in different areas could make you swing either way. I mean neuroscience is still in it's infancy, so a lot of this is just observing and trying to see patterns. Saying "brain damage makes you conservative" is too broad of a claim. It's certainly not backed by this study.

EDIT: One more thing I don't really understand is what this argument is trying to achive anyway. Do you want to take voting rights from people who had a stroke because they can't decide for themselves? This topic is really thin ice and it's usually fascist groups that propose such things.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It wouldn't surprise me to see if other types of brain damage could make you more liberal too.

I will happily read a study that demonstrates this, however I have only been able to locate results that show brain injuries tend to make people more conservative.

If you want anyone to take you seriously on this topic you need to provide more than conjecture.

As for my argument, I have done nothing more than provide the facts as I understand them based on scientific studies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

Saying "brain damage makes you conservative" is too broad of a claim

Just circling back to this because that is explicitly not what I said. Read what I commented again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Voting rights no, but maybe that should be replaced by appointment after major head injuries. I'd also like to see an age limit on candidates tied to SS retirement age.