this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
532 points (96.8% liked)

World News

40513 readers
3795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States has announced the approval of the sale of more than $7.4bn in bombs, missiles and related equipment to Israel, which has used American-made weapons to devastating effect during the war in Gaza.

The state department has signed off on the sale of $6.75bn in bombs, guidance kits and fuses, in addition to $660m in Hellfire missiles, according to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA).

The proposed sale of the bombs “improves Israel’s capability to meet current and future threats, strengthen its homeland defense, and serves as a deterrent to regional threats”, the DSCA said in a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Biden was getting his sorry ass kicked until South Carolina where he got one critical endorsement to edge out a slight victory. Then the party's buddies in big media ran a "Biden miracle" story and the party got all the other candidates to drop out and put their full support behind Biden just before super Tuesday. They also funded a PAC to keep Warren in the race to split votes with Sanders. Thanks to the moronic primary process, after that point it's like a snowball rolling downhill because by the later states, it will appear as if one candidate is the guaranteed winner so supporters of other candidates won't bother showing up. It's why superdelegates were used in 2016 to make it look like Clinton was too far ahead for Sanders to matter. All that plus it's a party-controlled process where diehard party supporters are more likely to vote in that process than normal voters, so you'll have an automatic bias for the party favorite (some milquetoast center-right stooge).

If you want to ignore all that and focus on raw dumb numbers, then you should consider that the voting population of the US is much greater than ~30 million people. Do you think all those other voters' choices don't matter?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Bernie would have been a better choice, but it wasn't even a close race with 19 Million to 9 Million. It wasn't even close. No amount of PAC funding can have that huge of an impact or we would have seen that disparity in the Generals as well. It was 67.85% to 32.14% if you don't count the other candidates, a lead of 35.71%. Biden literally doubled the Bernie Sanders vote totals.

That's not corruption. That's how US Citizens voted in the primaries.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thanks for ignoring the entirety of my response to return to the raw dumb numbers without the context. You remind me of people who post crime statistics of Black Americans to try to prove a racist point. Don't bother replying if you're just going to ignore the counterargument.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

If you think you can argue with numbers that's more on you than me.