this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
561 points (98.3% liked)

movies

2326 readers
735 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was expecting a generic alien invasion movie, and I was pleasantly surprised

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I read this stuff casually and I was generally familiar with the theories in both Arrival and Interstellar, but I couldn't make heads or tails of either when I watched the movies. I completely missed what they were pointing at in Interstellar and thought they butchered the idea that Amy Adams was caught in her own frame of how she understood her experience of time.

I am sure that's my problem, but I truly wonder how anyone was supposed to appreciate the movies without internalizing the critical theories

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Very happy to see my notion shared on this platform.

"But the science"

Miss me with that bullshit, you don't get to tote how "scientifically accurate" something is in the first half (it wasn't) and then get time travel/self recurrence in the second half.

It was just a bad movie with high production value, if I want that I'll watch moonfall.