this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
398 points (88.0% liked)

Science Memes

12351 readers
3436 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
398
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Carbon capture is problematic. If I remember the area required to reduce C02 would be the size of Georgia and the air intake would be pulling in hurricane force winds. The numbers could be off but it would be a massive project that would require to be built by probably CO2 dumping infrastructure like factories.

Personally I'd say it would be better to colonize the Pacific Ocean so algae goes in deep ocean to be a carbon sink

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

I've heard that's why the carbon capture is best done directly out of the machinery that creates the carbon dioxide.

[–] MDCCCLV 1 points 3 days ago

It works much better if you use a concentrated pipeline of CO2 like emissions from a fossil fuel power plant. Of course they tried that with carbon capture and it was still too expensive.