Futurology

2099 readers

125 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, researchers find (techxplore.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is just not what the article means when it talks about carbon capture

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Does timber contain carbon? Yes
Does concrete emit carbon? Yes
Where did the carbon in the timber come from? 🪿🪿🪿

The article talks about how moving to renewables is better than staying with fossil, which is true. It is also true that we need fossil sources for things that don’t have an alternative (yet, like steel production) It is also true that to keep the price of more expensive cleaner option viable carbon credits help

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Hint: photosynthesis