this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
583 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

5309 readers
1763 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’d rather gaming developers have that money than casinos.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only it was the programmers and the development team that received 100% of every purchase.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

100% is a bit absurd but a large portion of the income yes

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I'm willing to be ridiculous, because the pittance most workaday programmers and designers get from their hits is also ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, even 50% would be baller. So like 20% to the storefront, 20% to the publisher, and 10% to random other costs.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd rather indie devs have that money than greedy corporations and casinos.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

They won't admit it, but most AAA game companies are casinos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same. Most of the money I spend on games goes to indie devs, and I'll usually only buy a AAA if it's either on steep discount or actually really good. Something like 70% to indies, 30% to AAA.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Too bad money goes directly to the publisher to decide who gets what.