this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
326 points (96.8% liked)

politics

20366 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To be honest and a bit pedantic, it's a continuation of the cold war. There has been no 3rd world war and likely as not due to; Russia's complete mishandling of their nuclear arsenal and China's economic interests, there is little threat of one. The US intelligence departments know this. And with Gabbard as the DNI Chief I'm pretty sure Russia has a finger on the pulse of what we will know. There are rumblings of compartmentalization efforts in the Intelligence communities and there are rumors of rogue efforts to keep sensitive intel within the DOD and subsequent cells and away from the DNI and the Executive branch. We're living in absolutely insane times and the US Hegemony is at it's most vulnerable now. I am not for US Hegemony in the general sense and I do not think that it is the only stabilizing force in world politics. But when a power vacuum forms, it's rare that stability follows in the short term.

If there were ever a time for a general strike to depose and defang the executive branch it is now. However, I don't see the general US populace doing anything on behalf of Ukraine or to further the Hegemony.

With what Musk is allowing DOGE to do we're headed for another great recession. Maybe that will be the inciting event to have a revolution. But I just don't know. The Constitution setup the branches of the government in such a naive way. There are no true checks and balances, just gentleman's agreements to "behave in the best interests of the country". To wit, the Constitution was designed to be a living document to be amended and changed to fit the current society it governs, but this has not been the case. Impeachment does nothing, we have a convicted felon in the White House and a foreign born national directing policy. These are uncharted waters but I don't think anything short of a general strike will change anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I agree on all your points. I like to call it ww3 bc “but US won Cold War, no more Berlin Wall”. Also ww3 sounds scarier and I want people to freak out in a real way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fair enough, like I said the point I made was pedantic. Your points stand regardless of if it's called WW3 or anything else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Btw the first word of ur username should be correct

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I couldn’t justify putting correct in my username on Lemmy. But I loved the reference too much not to use it, so here I am, a less secure truncated version of a better password.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

did we just become best friends?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Wanna build bunk beds? You can have top bunk. Mom still has me with rubber sheets.