this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
395 points (99.3% liked)

HistoryPorn

5456 readers
309 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pretty much every gun law we have is/was rooted in racism. The picture above is what started California's crazy gun laws. Armed blacks!? In my streets?!

Here's a gun law you'll love! In Alabama you have to apply to the county sheriff for a conceal-carry license. Told my friend, "Good thing you're a middle-aged white guy. That'll be a rubber stamp." Meanwhile, in Florida, now that we no longer need a license to carry, the state sent mine 4 years after applying. Uh, thanks, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, the Black Panthers inadvertently spurred Reagan and the NRA to author the Mulford Act, which was (at the time) the most restrictive gun control law in the country. Yes, the same Reagan that conservatives put on a pedestal as a paragon of conservative values. Yes, the same NRA that lobbies congress to relax gun control laws in the wake of school shootings.

It’s because people realized that peaceful unarmed protests got violently busted by cops, but peaceful armed protests were politely watched from across the street. When lawmakers saw a bunch of armed black people on their front doorstep and saw the police were totally unwilling to stop them, they got really fucking sweaty really fucking fast. And so the Mulford Act was born, as an attempt to strip black people of their guns and prevent them from organizing armed protests.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Everybody hard and wet over all these guns until they get in the hands of the marginalized.

“Oh, people using the 2nd amendment how it was meant to be used? Can’t have that, nope. Get that constitution out of my face. Fuck the constitution.” - Americans

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Commenting, as always, to say that's not how the 2A was meant to be used. That's a modern interpretation. Read it for yourself. It's clearly talking about having militias ready to fight an invading country, as was standard practice at the time. Standing professional armies were unusual, especially for newly formed small nations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well I just think that whole part about “being necessary to the security of a free State” could be speaking about foreign or domestic threats.

And god fucking damn it I can’t find a SINGLE useful webpage on the original text of the 2nd amendment. Fuckin’ pissing me off lmao I swear this happens any time I try to find something about the constitution, it’s a god damned mess lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Really? This is the site for amendments (for now at least). It's the second result when I search. Second to Wikipedia.

I can see the argument for what you said, but it pretty clearly isn't the primary reason, looking back with a historical lense. It also specifically says "well regulated militia" which definitely does not refer to people with no training who never use their weapon having one in their house. Usually a militia would store their weapons in a central place and would also train to be ready when called. The individual storage and ownership thing is not the expectation historically.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I see, thanks for explaining. And for the link.

But since we’re talking about Black Panthers, don’t they meet the criteria for being a militia? That’s what I was referring to in my original comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It depends on the definition, but not really. Pretty much every definition is an army of citizens the state can call into service when needed. It isn't just an organized group of armed people.