this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
864 points (99.3% liked)

News

25462 readers
4830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 days ago (15 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Not really. Not buying things for one day isn't going to have any impact on anything.

Having a strike or boycott with an end date is completely pointless.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Agreed. Might as well call the next day the 'buy twice as much as normal' protest, because that's all that will happen.

[–] CileTheSane 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a first step to gauge the amount of support for the cause. If you can't convince people not to purchase things for just one day your sure as fuck not going to be able to convince them to not go to work.

If you support a boycott or general strike then I hope you're willing to do the bare minimum of not making purchases on one specific day even if you think it isn't going to much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How exactly do you gauge the effects? Do you have access to their daily financials? Because just gauging the support and nothing else feels like the literal definition of performative action.

Not sure why the next step after not purchasing for a day is to not go to your job. Seems like it would be to not purchase for a week, or month, or permanently stop giving companies your money.

If the general public lacks the focus to do anything more than a day, then the specific action that one day should be radically different. Something very simple that overwhelms stores and forces your hand tomorrow and the next day. For example, everyone could go out that day and intentionally get trespassed from a store they don't like. Not as a group, individually throughout the day. It doesn't have to be violent or even illegal, just break policy - go in without wearing shoes or something.

[–] CileTheSane 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

everyone could go out that day and intentionally get trespassed from a store they don't like. Not as a group, individually throughout the day. It doesn't have to be violent or even illegal, just break policy - go in without wearing shoes or something.

"How exactly do you gauge the effects? Because just gauging the support and nothing else feels like the literal definition of performative action."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess my response is the entire middle part of my other comment that you just cut out to try to make a point. I'm just not going to bother copying things around.

Ill try to spell it out a bit better though. The one day of protest causes a permanent change - you're banned from a store. And the store does all the fucking work for you after the first day to keep you from buying there.

If you want paperwork to gauge the effect, ask the police for the trespass in writing.

[–] CileTheSane 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So not purchasing from a store for a day isn't going to affect the store, but getting yourself kicked out of the store for not wearing shoes will?

Your saying not making purchases for a day will have no effect, but your counter suggestion will have no greater impact on the store but require a greater buy-in from the people taking part.

I'll try to spell it out again: this is the lowest possible bar to get people to take part. If successful, it shows everyone how many people are willing to take at least some action, which makes it easier to organize more meaningful action in the future.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes and yes.

Your second paragraph is just your first paragraph of question rephrased as confident conclusions with absolutely no facts or information inbetween. It's weird, man. Is this AI? That's not how it works.

It's a miserably low bar that's been done a hundred times over to zero effect. It feels like an idea born straight out of a boardroom meeting to lessen the effects of protests. Billionaires probably giggle and try to guess who floated this one to the masses.

[–] CileTheSane 1 points 4 days ago

Your ~~second paragraph~~ first sentence is just your ~~first paragraph of question~~ last post rephrased as confident conclusions with absolutely no facts or information ~~inbetween.~~ in either. It’s weird, man. ~~Is this AI?~~ Why am I held to a different standard than you? That’s not how it works.

It feels like an idea born straight out of a boardroom meeting to lessen the effects of protests

Ah, but "get yourself kicked out of stores", something the only mildly annoys the workers and doesn't affect the owners at all, THAT will have the billionaires shaking in their boots!

This entire thread is you trying to lessen then effects of protests. If I'm misunderstanding you then try taking the boot out of your mouth before speaking.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)