this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
462 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20474 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump has reportedly slashed funding for the NIH’s Roy Blunt Center for Alzheimer’s Research, leading to layoffs, including its incoming director.

The center, named after former GOP Senator Roy Blunt, was a Republican-backed initiative to advance Alzheimer’s and dementia research. Despite previously championing the program, Republicans have remained silent on the cuts.

Experts warn weakening the center will significantly set back Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s research.

Critics argue the move contradicts past GOP support and lacks justification from either party or scientific leaders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Explain to me what the point of voting for democrats is when all they’re doing in “opposition” is confirming his nominees.

They won’t even do the bare minimum. Obstruction. They won’t even obstruct. Fuck them and fuck you too. They’re not an opposition party and voting for them would have the same outcome.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  1. They wouldn't be voting on Trump nominees if Trump didn't win

  2. The Democrats are a coalition that includes conservative and centrists as well as leftists. Their presence isn't a reason to hand total control to party that instituted a muslim ban.

They’re not an opposition party and voting for them would have the same outcome

Oh clearly, they'd be firing hundreds of thousands of public servants, specifically black and women as DEI. 🙄

I was good and answered your questions. You should answer mine, I'm incredibly curious about what an intelligent person thought and thinks will happen to the Palestinians now that the racist sexist paty has total control, and why you think that outcome wasn't worth preventing.


Also, a little Wikipedia history lesson for you 🧠🔥

During the Weimar Republic, the left-wing political spectrum was divided between the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Communist Party of Germany (KPD). This division significantly weakened the left and indirectly facilitated the rise of the Nazi Party (NSDAP).

The KPD viewed the SPD as "social fascists" and prioritized opposing them over combating the Nazis. The KPD believed that the collapse of the Weimar Republic under Nazi rule would hasten a communist revolution. This ideological stance led them to refuse collaboration with the SPD against the Nazis, even during critical elections and political crises[1][4][6].

This lack of unity between leftist parties created a fragmented opposition, which allowed the Nazis to consolidate power more effectively. The SPD, while supporting democracy, was unable to counter both the far-right and far-left threats simultaneously[1][3].

Citations: [1] Weimar and Nazi Germany (1918-1939): Political Parties ... - Tutor2u https://www.tutor2u.net/history/reference/political-parties-of-the-weimar-republic [2] Reasons the support of the Nazi Party grew - WJEC - BBC Bitesize https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zp34srd/revision/2 [3] The role of political instability in the Nazi rise to power https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-nazi-rise-to-power/the-nazi-rise-to-power/the-role-of-political-instability/ [4] Weimar political parties - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_political_parties [5] Were the Nazis Socialists? | Britannica https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists [6] The Weimar Republic - Holocaust Encyclopedia https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-weimar-republic [7] Weimar Democracy in Crisis - State of Deception: The Power of Nazi ... https://exhibitions.ushmm.org/propaganda/1918-1933/weimar-democracy-in-crisis [8] Political instability in the Weimar Republic - The Holocaust Explained https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-nazi-rise-to-power/the-weimar-republic/political-instability/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
  1. They wouldn't be voting on Trump nominees if Trump didn't win

They would be enacting the same agenda. Genocide, anti immigrant, anti trans. They’re a fraudulent party.

  1. The Democrats are a coalition that includes conservative and centrists as well as leftists. Their presence isn't a reason to hand total control to party that instituted a muslim ban.

Which is why there’s no point in voting for them because they don’t stand for shit.

Oh clearly, they'd be firing hundreds of thousands of public servants, specifically black and women as DEI. 🙄

What musk is doing is completely illegal. What are the democrats doing to stop it? ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY NOTHING!!!!

Don’t give me a fucking “history lesson” about the Weimar Republic you dumb fucking liberal. The liberals fought the communists and enabled the fascists. You seemed to learn all the wrong lessons just like the complicit democrat collaborators.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The dodging of the previous question is so loud it's deafening.

You don't actually think your decision would produce better material results. You cared only for the emotional kick you're getting out of it, you're addicted to youe brain's own stress chemicals.

You must've felt so empty during the Biden administration and didn't know why. Then Oct 7th happened and BAM your brain floods with norepinephrine and GABA with a little seratonin chaser. You wanted more and more! Just gaza wasn't enough for you, they had to fuck up the west bank too! Shit bring it all home! The worse the news gets the better your high!!!

Don’t give me a fucking “history lesson” about the Weimar Republic you dumb fucking liberal. The liberals fought the communists and enabled the fascists.

I cited my sources, you didn't. My beliefs are based in reality, yours are based one whichever gives you the most cortisol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You’re literally a lib with a horrific misunderstanding of history.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/a-liberal-accord-with-nazism-1.711626

https://jacobin.com/2015/11/nuremberg-trials-hitler-goebbels-himmler-german-communist-social-democrats/

The German Social Democratic Party (SPD) understood what sort of threat the NSDAP posed, yet failed to put up the kind of fight necessary to stop them. In a desperate attempt to block the Nazis from taking power through legal means and save Weimar democracy, the SPD pursued a strategy of supporting the “lesser evil” — i.e., the current right-wing, authoritarian government — as a bulwark against Hitler (who would certainly be even more right wing and authoritarian).

This entailed support for the candidacy of archconservative Hindenburg in the 1932 presidential election and toleration of Brüning and von Papen’s authoritarian presidential cabinets, as well as the tax hikes and spending cuts they enacted.  The strategy ran counter to the party’s political program, not to mention the material interests of its supporters.

The weakness of this strategy was particularly obvious on July 20, 1932, when Chancellor von Papen dissolved the SPD-led government in Prussia, the largest state in the republic. The SPD had already organized workers’ militias for precisely such a situation, the so-called Iron Front, a year earlier. But when faced with an actual confrontation the party leadership abandoned armed resistance, instead urging calm and restraint.

The German trade union confederation (ADGB) followed a similar path. Many trade unionists were also SPD members and supported the lesser evil strategy, tolerating Hindenburg’s government in hopes of stopping the Nazis through constitutional means. Consequentially, they also refrained from calling for a general strike in Prussia in 1932.

Thus, most Communists no longer knew Social Democrats as work colleagues, but only as supporters of the lesser-evil strategy and events like “Bloody May” on May 1, 1929, when police under the command of Social Democrat Karl Friedrich Zörgiebel violently suppressed a KPD-led demonstration.

Accentuating the blockade was the SPD leadership’s outright refusal to collaborate with the Communists. The SPD at the time was consumed by an anti-Communist fervor, often equating Communism with Nazism. Party Chairman Otto Wels declared at the Leipzig party convention in 1931 that “Bolshevism and fascism are brothers. They are both founded on violence and dictatorship, regardless of how socialist or radical they may appear.”

Trotsky and Thalheimer’s appeals for a united front were well-received by workers and intellectuals, as the popular desire for unity in the face of the growing Nazi threat was understandably widespread. This desire could be seen in the “Urgent Call for Unity” issued by thirty-three well-known public intellectuals including Albert Einstein in the run-up to the 1932 elections, calling for the KPD and SPD to “finally take a step toward building a united labor front, which is necessary not just for parliamentary, but for additional defense as well.”

Like I said, the liberals sided with “lesser evil” fascists than work with communists until the very end.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Homie, in this scenario you are the one who supported the nazi party through your inaction.

I didn't pick the center right or far right option over the far left. I choose the furthest left option that was offered to me each time.

Let me reiterate that:

I support the most leftist candidate in evety single election I have the opportunity to participate in. You stay home and let the furthest right candidate win.

What do you think happens when a party in a polarized system like the US loses? They shift their positions closer to the the party that beat them.

You want to know why there is no decent left-wing party in the US? Because Ronald Reagan in the 80s beat them so badly they had to run breakneck speed to the right to win back voters.

When the Democratic party loses, they don't think 'Boy golly, i guess I better try to appeal to the leftists who statistically hardly ever participate in elections' they think 'I need to be more like the winner.'

Also: answer the fucking questions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t owe you shit debate me bro and I’m so fucking sick of fucking out to brunch liberals who stupidly think these people give a flying fuck about their law and order and decorum.

The SDP put the nazis in power by supporting the “lesser evil” conservatives over the communists.(sound familiar?) In America, the democrat party put the fascists in power by rigging the 2016 and 2020 primaries away from Bernie. They handed trump the election in 2016 and 2024, and had covid never happened trump would have won in 2020 unless the democrats also ran a populist. When Obama bailed out Wall Street in 2008 instead of Main Street he created the material conditions that allows fascism to accelerate. And he did a great job closing Guantánamo - soon to be a concentration camp for migrants and god knows who else. And all the executive branch power grabs since I’ve been alive that congress and the judiciary never bothered to stop. There’s been so many fucking off ramps missed that it’s intentional at this point. The wealthy want to kill most of us “useless eaters” off and rule the rubble in their “network states”. You don’t fucking get it and never fucking will. You’re a smug fucking liberal who doesn’t listen to marginalized people with the generational trauma of genocide no less.

When the Democratic party loses, they don't think 'Boy golly, i guess I better try to appeal to the leftists who statistically hardly ever participate in elections' they think 'I need to be more like the winner.'

God you’re so fucking dumb. What a winning fucking strategy. Are you a fucking boomer? What the fuck is this “yeah ratcheting to the right is a great idea! Let’s be fascist lite!” Fucking mask off moment right there! Thanks for proving my point about the democrats being UTTERLY FUCKING USELESS TO VOTE FOR. vote for the party of stabbing instead of shooting! Fuck outta here you weirdo debate me bro

THE DEMOCRATS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RISE OF TRUMP AND THE FASCISTS. THEY ARE A CONTROLLED OPPOSITION PARTY CURRENTLY CONFIRMING HIS NOMINEES THEY WON’T EVEN DO THE BARE MINIMUM AND OBSTRUCT. THE DEMOCRATS ARE COMPLICIT AND COMPLACENT IN GENOCIDE AND THE RISE OF FASCISM. THE TECHNOLOGY USED IN PALESTINE WILL BE USED AGAINST US NEXT. THE DEMOCRATS WONT SAVE YOU BUT WILL INSTEAD GIVE A LEGAL PATH TO THE FASCISTS TO HUNT YOU DOWN AND MURDER YOU.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Answer the question or admit you're an unhinged cortisol addict who is literally getting off on the thought of pain and suffering being brought down on you and everyone else.

Seriously, just re-read your responses. Just progressively more and more doomerism the more I corner you. You have no hope or plan for the future outside of accepting the boot on your neck and getting frothing mad at the people trying actually to prevent the backsliding into fascism.

I am looking for a path forward, while you are giving up and embracing defeat.

Answer the question. Not for me, but for your own personal growth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t owe you shit debate me bro. Fuck off. Blocked.

Keep supporting fascists and their collaborators, dipshit.

I get “frothing mad” at people who support FASCIST COLLABORATORS thinking they’re “helping”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I consider this you admitting defeat. Thank you.