Gaming

30879 readers

193 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Make your complaints heard about bad games, says Dragon Age veteran Mark Darrah, but "your $70 doesn't buy you cruelty" (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Answering GDC's 2023 survey, 78% of respondents said they considered the harassment and toxicity developers receive from the public to be a serious issue. A simple sentiment is often the most effective, and the title of Dragon Age veteran Mark Darrah's latest video cuts right to the heart of it: "Your $70 doesn't buy you cruelty."

You don't have to like a game, and you don't have stay quiet if you have complaints, says Darrah. You're entitled to be angry, and you're entitled to express that anger. "If you are mad at that Ubisoft game, be mad at Ubisoft," he says. "Express your anger to Ubisoft or the studio that made the game. But you cross a line when you start being cruel about it." (Thanks, PC Gamer and GamesRadar)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

NES games cost $60-$70 nearly 40 years ago. That would be like $150 if adjusted for inflation.

And if anything, the scale and cost of developing video games has skyrocketed since then...

Just something to consider...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Back when you also got a physical product with an instruction manual and possibly a poster or something else. Now we get a digital license that can be revoked and six months to a year of patching for it to be in a stable state. Yay!

Just something to consider...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

And 40 years ago the federal minimum wage was $3.35, which adjusts to $9.89 today. Inflation for businesses isn't an excuse when the inflation for consumers isn't keeping up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I've purchased many games at $40 or less over the past year that have given me hundred of hours of joy and entertainment.

If I spend almost twice that price on a game, and it's unfinished, buggy, and heavily monetized; you can bet your ass I'm going to be upset.

It's not about the cost of development. It's about quality of the experience. For indie devs, the game has to be good to do well. For a lot of AAA studios, the game is merely a product that only has to be as entertaining as it needs to be for them to make enough profit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

if we accept 70€ then they increase the price to 80€. when we accept that they increase it to 90€ and so on. Though i guess this becomes kind of moot point when high price on game has started to correlate with lower quality on every aspect except graphics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The cost of developing games hasn't skyrocketed. Developers have more means than ever. Many things that was handcrafted on crappy slow computers then are auto-generated in seconds now.

There's no massive shipping costs or printing of physical mediums anymore. And no losses if the already printed cassettes or CD's didn't sell.

If a game costs hundreds of millions to develop, in this day and age, it's by design and/or because of bloated companies.