this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
268 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20507 readers
4557 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump said he is starting a program which would offer residency and a path to citizenship for investors who commit at least $5 million to projects in the US.

Trump said the program, dubbed the “gold card,” would launch in two weeks, adding that he did not believe his administration needed to secure approval from Congress.

“We’re going to be selling a gold card,” Trump said Tuesday in the Oval Office as he signed executive orders alongside Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

“We’re going to be putting a price on that card of about $5 million, and that’s going to give you green card privileges,” he added, referencing the permits currently issued to US permanent residents.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

My grandparents and great grandparents came to the US with almost nothing, as the voyage alone cost a life's savings.

But the 19th century American economy had just finished Native genocide. We had enormous undeveloped tracks of land and a party - The Republicans - eager to goose the economy with settlers willing to do the hard parts of domestic development for next to nothing.

Rapidly populating the interior with European migrants was a post-Civil War power play, intended to secure territories with party loyal serfs and turn expensive frontier territory into profitable industrial centers.

"Give me your cheap exploitable migrant labor, yearning to work 16 hour days for less than the cost of living" might have been a more accurate phrasing. But the policy of open borders (for Europeans) was real.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

*tracts of land

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mostly meant that last part. You weren't gonna get ahead here unless you were a rich white land owning slaver. This idea that the U.S. is or was some bastion of hope and freedom is a straight up lie.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Free" land was a huge step up from being a serf or a conscript in some European fief. Also, the US was one of the first western nations to implement public education, un-tolled roadways, and public utilities. But you were still a cog in a much larger machine. You just had a bit more autonomy than someone "bound to the land" or otherwise pinned in by rival military powers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it wasn't free, we killed all the people who lived here and stole their land. Much more accurate description of what really happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hence the quotes.

The primary reason for the genocide and subsequent settler occupation was to establish a more pliant population. Initially, that was through the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (the Haitian island being the Ur-example - exterminate the natives and kidnap people across the ocean to press gang into service). European migration became a more "free market" alternative.

But the European migration worked in large part because Europeans were fleeing the same kind of Haitian-tier exploitation in Europe. For European refugees (many of whom fled the 30 Years, Napoleonic, and WW1 eras of conflict) the US was absolutely a step up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It was French trolling.