this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20522 readers
3893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration has announced a new registry for undocumented immigrants, requiring them to self-report, provide fingerprints, and list their addresses.

Those who fail to comply could face fines or prosecution under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The move aligns with the administration’s broader crackdown on illegal immigration and mass deportation plans.

Critics, including the National Immigration Law Center, warn the registry could be used to target individuals for deportation, drawing parallels to past government efforts to register noncitizens for national security purposes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is because being undocumented is not a crime.

This will create a crime that undocumented people can be charged with. Probably a second degree felony to guaranteed a prison sentence and allow regular law enforcement to be used to arrest these people.

People should have seen this coming when they started making other lists, but sex offenders were an easy target. Who would speak up about such a list?

By the time your group is on a list; for example, if Trump decides to enforce federal marijuana laws on blue states, then it'll be far too late to say anything (you dirty criminal).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The executive doesn't get to create crimes. I want to see where in the US code they're drawing the idea for criminal punishment. The cited code doesn't provide for any punishment. As read on it's own it's effectively toothless.

Edit to add-

Okay, I finally found the punishment section. It's 8 USC 1306 and yeah we can see why it hasn't been used before. Six months in jail or 1,000 dollars fine for willfully failing to register. For which they essentially have to prove a thought crime, (you knew and did not register). Failure to update an existing registration is simply removal.

So the law hasn't been used because we already have the authority to remove unregistered immigrants and paying for their short jail stay is a ridiculous mismanagement of money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Willfully failing to register doesn't mean 'you knew and did not register', ignorance of the law isn't a defense.

Willfully failing to register means 'you didn't register and you were not in a coma or otherwise prevented to doing so by things outside of your control'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Ignorance of the law is actually a defence in many situations. You're thinking about the reasonable person standard, ignorance of things like lying for monetary gain isn't a defence. Not knowing you're supposed to fill out more paperwork through a language barrier is exactly where it's a defence.